[circuit theory] Transfer function of feedback network

Status
Not open for further replies.

melkord

Full Member level 3
Joined
May 18, 2018
Messages
151
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
18
Activity points
1,771
In the system with negative feedback, what is described by G(s) actually? is it G(s)=A(s)/Y(s) ?

If I want to derive Y(s)/X(s), is it a correct way to derive G(s)=A(s)/Y(s) and then I can plug it in to the equation (8.2)?

With simple resistor as feedback, I usually derive the transfer function directly.
But right now, I have a quite complicated feedback network with some frequency-dependent components.
That's why I want to derive G(s) first.




 

Attachments

  • 1639570082378.png
    138.3 KB · Views: 95

Attachments

  • AN154.pdf
    843.2 KB · Views: 130
Last edited:
Just derive the G(s) element expression, and plug that
into 8.2, just as you do for H(s).

sorry it is a bit unclear for me.
I think I should derive G(s)=A(s)/Y(s) when the feedback network is detached from the feedforward. Is this correct?


I will check your links. Thanks
 

Yes, you treat G(s) as a stand alone network with an input
and output. But dont use Y(s) as input because that would make
it a f( G(s), X(s), Y(s) ). So make input Z(s), output A(s), and then
solve for is T(s) = A(s) / Z(s) and plug that into the general T(s)
for the overall problem.

Regards, Dana.
 
I wonder what you mean with "derive G(s)"? The feedback factor is intentionally chosen in the design process.
 

You are stating in post #1:
I have a quite complicated feedback network with some frequency-dependent components.
That's why I want to derive G(s) first.
In this case, G(s) will be described by a rational function with numerator and denominator coefficients (zeros and poles). Consider that the "detached" feedback network must be loaded similarly to the final circuit.
 


Status
Not open for further replies.
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…