Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Best way of controlling Triac for my soldering station

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sajjadkhan

Full Member level 5
Joined
Sep 25, 2010
Messages
307
Helped
17
Reputation
34
Reaction score
16
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Rawalpindi,Pakistan
Activity points
4,199
Conventional method to control triac is to fire it at a desired angle i.e if i am controlling my 60W soldering iron at half the power and temperature then i m firing my triac at 90 degrees. but this design will not work if i am working with a UPS ( square wave ) system in case of power failure, so any ideas for what if i feed pwm to the opto coupler and controll the triac?? i think it should run fine :-D
 

FvM

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 22, 2008
Messages
47,511
Helped
14,055
Reputation
28,365
Reaction score
12,716
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Bochum, Germany
Activity points
276,254
Heater control is generally using full wave switching instead of phase angle control. According to power quality regulations, phase angle control is only permitted for lighting applications.

Full wave switching won't have problems with square wave input. By the way, I don't see why phase angle shouldn't work with UPS as well.
 

dick_freebird

Advanced Member level 5
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
6,920
Helped
2,026
Reputation
4,056
Reaction score
1,866
Trophy points
1,393
Location
USA
Activity points
55,413
With a square wave UPS, there is not the nice gradual
sine slope for a differentiator-based peak detector to
work from; this is the scheme I recall using for SCR
motor drives, some decades back, anyway. The time
base probably needs some thinking if it's supposed to
be direct-mains.

Me, I think I'd rectify and filter (forgetting power
factor for a non-commercial article) and do a DC-DC
control. Much more forgiving of line power details,
but needing a pretty fat filter bank.
 

ALERTLINKS

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Dec 13, 2003
Messages
1,259
Helped
394
Reputation
782
Reaction score
379
Trophy points
1,363
Location
Pakistan
Activity points
7,263
Zero crossing optocoupler MOC3041 is suitable in this application.


Input is not phase angle control but on/off with 3-5 degree hysteresis.
 

betwixt

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
14,377
Helped
4,728
Reputation
9,471
Reaction score
4,497
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Aberdyfi, West Wales, UK
Activity points
122,673
Not sure why you need a peak detector for phase control, why not use zero crossing? Sine and modifed sine both have zero crossing so a phase angle trigger will still work. As FvM pointed out, it isn't normal or even legal to use that kind of control on some loads. A better solution would be to use or drop full cycles, for example use one in ten for 10% power, five in ten for 50% or all of them for full power.

Brian.
 

picgak

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Oct 13, 2011
Messages
407
Helped
101
Reputation
202
Reaction score
101
Trophy points
1,323
Activity points
3,177
Triac phase angle control circuits will not work properly in Square wave supply unless it is specificaly designed for it
 

betwixt

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
14,377
Helped
4,728
Reputation
9,471
Reaction score
4,497
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Aberdyfi, West Wales, UK
Activity points
122,673
In a modified sine inverter there will be a longer zero voltage time than in a sine converter but other than that a phase angle controller should still work. The principle of delaying the turn-on point still applies and as in a sine system, it's primarily the mark/space ratio of the power transfer that decides how much reaches the load. The control may not be as 'linear' as it would with a sine wave but it should still work. Remember that in a heating aplication to objective isn't to control the voltage so there is no point in only using the falling part of the sine cycle. Switching for complete cycles is still the better way to do it though.

Brian.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top