Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Basic Doubts in MOSFET..

Status
Not open for further replies.

subbuindia

Member level 5
Joined
Dec 13, 2011
Messages
87
Helped
11
Reputation
22
Reaction score
10
Trophy points
1,288
Location
Vellalacheruvu(AP), India
Activity points
1,908
Hi friends,

I have a few general doubts about MOSFETs.

1)Is it need to maintain same size and same doping for both source and drain.? If, why.?

2)What is the need of SiO2 for only gate and why not for source, drain.?

3)Why do we choose CMOS when MOSFET(NMOS) is present.?

Please, kindly reply these questions. I studied the concepts, but I didn't get any clarity..
 

Hi friends,

I have a few general doubts about MOSFETs.

1)Is it need to maintain same size and same doping for both source and drain.? If, why.?

2)What is the need of SiO2 for only gate and why not for source, drain.?

3)Why do we choose CMOS when MOSFET(NMOS) is present.?

Please, kindly reply these questions. I studied the concepts, but I didn't get any clarity..



Good questions
I will explain these according to my understanding of the concepts
1)There is a counter doping which is followed for source and drain formation.The source and drain terminals are interchangeable so it will be good for the flow of current and the parasitics which get formed will be same if both are of the same size.For calculation of currents and transistor working regions by considering same areas parasitics will be easy.Go through miller capacitances you will get a clear idea about this.
2)As u might be knowing the gate with the substrate acts as a capacitor and silicon dioxide is nothing but the dielectric.So the gate with the dielectric helps in the formation of channel where as if Silicon dioxide was not present it would be like 2 metal plates shorted.For source and drain the metal is connected so no need of silicon dioxide there but to separate the transistors from neighbouring transistors LOCOS or STI processes are followed.
3)I dont know the gut level understanding as to why but with CMOS power dissipation will be less when compared to NMOS logic.

- - - Updated - - -

And the source area and the drain area is maintained as minimum as possible(as of DRC) because it can even reduce area.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top