Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Atmel or PIC? - looking fot the best brand

Status
Not open for further replies.

swanann2000

Member level 1
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
32
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
236
Atmel or PIC?

I'm looking for the best brand, as a core, as global system...

Thanks in advance.
 

Stark

Member level 2
Joined
Aug 10, 2001
Messages
51
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
342
Although they are good cores and they are suitable for a big range of application if you need professional platform the best solution is hitachi microcontroller family,bye Stark.
 

mrmookiebud

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Oct 4, 2002
Messages
19
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
96
Mmm, interesting. Not completely sure I'd agree but why do you say Hitachi is the best solution?
 

swanann2000

Member level 1
Joined
Oct 20, 2001
Messages
32
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
236
Thanks for reply, i think so; but we are looking for a low cost (1 dollar, 1.5 dollar), and low power consumption devices. Our choice was Atmel and PIC, what do you think?.

Thanks.
 

msmax

Full Member level 1
Joined
May 6, 2001
Messages
99
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Location
Pays Bas
Activity points
919
I think both perform well.
Choose your device on your requirements(I/O and Perif.) and check the lowest price.

Both are well supported for programming in C, Basic or Assembler. Both have a lot of circuits flying around for easy and cheap to make programmers as well as software to download to the controller.

I prefer PIC because I'm more familiar with them and the assembler used by Microchip, but I think it is just a matter of spending time to get familiarised with the Atmels.

Important is that a PIC running on 4 Mhz actually is running internally on 1 Mhz(divide by 4), which is not the case for Atmel.
 

panalog9

Full Member level 2
Joined
Feb 25, 2002
Messages
133
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,296
Location
USA
Activity points
849
You'll find that the Atmel AVR is easier to work with in general, though there is a larger 'net presense for the PIC. I find AVR support and resources to be perfectly fine though, and there are many projects out there with them.

The main thing is the non-pages memory - I *hate* that obsolete architecture that the PIC uses. The one-clockcycle/one-instruction deal with the AVR is pretty nice too :)
 

CADDevil

Member level 5
Joined
Jun 26, 2001
Messages
80
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
649
PIC/Atmel ?

IMHO both of them are good. I started with PIC, couple of years ago, I started to be more oriented to Atmel, because Microchip did not have any bigger uC with FLASH memory.
Now, when I need I2C or I need to write program in ASM, I use PICs. When I need to write program in C, I use Atmel.
 

msmax

Full Member level 1
Joined
May 6, 2001
Messages
99
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Location
Pays Bas
Activity points
919
panalog9:

Good point. I forget to tell about the memory pages which you have to pre select for bit/file opreations for certain registers.

This is really very unhandy. If you forget about this then it is a pain to troubleshoot your firmware.

Maybe this is a reason to look closer to the Atmels,but on the other hand once you know...
 

mrmookiebud

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Oct 4, 2002
Messages
19
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
96
I have used both Atmel and PIC and both have merits and the community support is good. Lately I have leaned toward Atmel because of the ease when working with the boot loading flash parts. Also, I found the dev tools a little cheaper and better engineered - particularily when working in C. Just my opinion though.
 

runner100

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Apr 27, 2002
Messages
26
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
183
I prefer Pics as they are much cheaper and also the basic compiler for Pic s is easier to learn IE Picbasicpro
 

DavidP

Member level 1
Joined
Jun 15, 2002
Messages
36
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Location
Israel
Activity points
316
Try both, learn them and use them as needed for youe specific project.

David
 

direnc

Member level 3
Joined
Jan 27, 2002
Messages
58
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
453
C'mon guys, 12X 14X 16X PICa are archaic and very cumbersome in terms of architecture. As far as i know what made them so popular is that they were the first microcontrollers to go that small in package and price.

Atmels are way faster and more elegant chips.
 

Kripton2035

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Jul 19, 2001
Messages
1,155
Helped
208
Reputation
418
Reaction score
180
Trophy points
1,353
Location
Western Europe
Activity points
7,716
the pics are cheaper. the atmel seems more elegant.
the "old" architecture of the pics (i.e. changing manually the page bank) is well handled by the compilers (basic or c). that's only if you want to use the assembler.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top