Nov 8, 2007 #1 E electro_nemo Junior Member level 2 Joined Jan 26, 2004 Messages 21 Helped 0 Reputation 0 Reaction score 0 Trophy points 1,281 Activity points 185 I've tried HFSS ver.10 and it's efficiency simulation is way off the measurement from chamber... any other candidates?
I've tried HFSS ver.10 and it's efficiency simulation is way off the measurement from chamber... any other candidates?
Nov 8, 2007 #2 A ADS_Marketing_Manager Newbie level 4 Joined Aug 19, 2005 Messages 6 Helped 2 Reputation 4 Reaction score 1 Trophy points 1,283 Location California Activity points 1,317 Take a look at the Antenna Modeling Design System http://eesof.tm.agilent.com/products/amds_main.html [/url]
Take a look at the Antenna Modeling Design System http://eesof.tm.agilent.com/products/amds_main.html [/url]
Nov 9, 2007 #3 N NiGo_bmstu Member level 1 Joined Oct 26, 2007 Messages 32 Helped 10 Reputation 20 Reaction score 3 Trophy points 1,288 Activity points 1,458 electro_nemo said: I've tried HFSS ver.10 and it's efficiency simulation is way off the measurement from chamber... any other candidates? Click to expand... my friend work witch antennas used Feco.
electro_nemo said: I've tried HFSS ver.10 and it's efficiency simulation is way off the measurement from chamber... any other candidates? Click to expand... my friend work witch antennas used Feco.
Nov 10, 2007 #4 J Jone Advanced Member level 4 Joined Oct 20, 2006 Messages 107 Helped 11 Reputation 22 Reaction score 4 Trophy points 1,298 Activity points 2,157 Well, I don't think the problem is the software but how you model your antenna. What kind of an antenna are you simulating? The most critical part is how you model dielectrics and setup meshing and other parameters. Is the chamber calibrated?
Well, I don't think the problem is the software but how you model your antenna. What kind of an antenna are you simulating? The most critical part is how you model dielectrics and setup meshing and other parameters. Is the chamber calibrated?