Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Antenn effect-charge accumulation

Status
Not open for further replies.

saha.123

Junior Member level 2
Joined
Jul 2, 2015
Messages
20
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
143
If we go with the jumper insertion(for example metal1-metal2-metal3-metal2-metal-1)for the antenna violation,then what about the total charges accumulated on the exposed conductor to the gate?whether the elongated metal connection to the gate with metal1 & jumper inserted connection to the gate both have same amount of charges??

thanks in advance
regards
saha
 

Charge dissipates between etch steps. You are trying to keep
the charge taken by any particular step, manageable. Once you
get to the jumper-layer etch, the preceding etches' charging
has been "reset" and the jumper itself has trivial periphery, for
a win.
 

  • During Reactive Ion Etching (RIE) of metal1 you have to consider metal1 + poly routing area for the antenna effect
  • During metal2 etch you have to consider metal2 + metal1 + poly routing areas
  • During metal3 etch you have to consider metal3 + metal2 + metal1 + poly routing areas

I think jumping back to lower metals may help only up to the metal2 etch (in your case). During metal3 etch it doesn't help, as the metal layers are already connected by their vias, so the trapped charges can accumulate on the total connected routing area anyway. If there's no junction connected on the way, better use a (small) reverse biased p-n-diode adjacent to the gate.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top