Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronic Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

a question about HFSS result

Status
Not open for further replies.

ChowChen

Junior Member level 2
Joined
May 7, 2005
Messages
20
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,429
I simulate a horn antenna by HFSS.But i find the gain G is smaller than the directivity D. Usually ,G=ε × D , ε is efficiency ,0<ε≤1.
 

aboozar.hamidipoor

Full Member level 3
Joined
Dec 21, 2004
Messages
152
Helped
17
Reputation
34
Reaction score
7
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Iran
Activity points
1,623
ChowChen said:
I simulate a horn antenna by HFSS.But i find the gain G is smaller than the directivity D. Usually ,G=ε × D , ε is efficiency ,0<ε≤1.
as you said:"the efficiency is smaller than 1 and so G must be lower than D" and it is clearly correct, also you said:"I find the gain is smaller than the directivity" and this is correct too, so
what is you problem exactly ?!
 

ChowChen

Junior Member level 2
Joined
May 7, 2005
Messages
20
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,429
Sorry, there is a wrong in my question.
The result of hfss is that the gain is larger than the directivity.
The result of Hfss is wrong?
 

Matt

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Jul 26, 2004
Messages
30
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
291
Sounds to me like your model has not converged.

Matt
 

asdfaaa

Full Member level 4
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
227
Helped
56
Reputation
112
Reaction score
14
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,530
ChowChen said:
Sorry, there is a wrong in my question.
The result of hfss is that the gain is larger than the directivity.
The result of Hfss is wrong?
Possible reasons:
1. in ur simulation model, metal loss is considered
2. mesh on the radiation boundary is too coarse, therefore the far field calculation is not accurate.

regards.
 

ChowChen

Junior Member level 2
Joined
May 7, 2005
Messages
20
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,429
Hi,asdfaa
thank you for u
the material of model is pec,so it is not the first case.
how to solve the problem of 2.
 

woshifanka

Full Member level 1
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
97
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
6
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
2,145
set the airbox lambda/4 larger where the lambda is the min (not max) lambda of your interested band
 

asdfaaa

Full Member level 4
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
227
Helped
56
Reputation
112
Reaction score
14
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,530
ChowChen said:
Hi,asdfaa
thank you for u
the material of model is pec,so it is not the first case.
how to solve the problem of 2.
Try to increase the mesh density on the radiation box surface, you can do it by assign mesh operation.

Regards,
 

Hassanagha

Newbie level 6
Joined
Jan 3, 2006
Messages
11
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,403
If You kwon, HFSS, and other softwares those solve the maxwell equations using numerical method, are dividing the Antenna and other mediums to diffrent pieses and will consider the wave on each pieces constant and fix. So if the length (area) of each picecs is long this consideration is wrong and you will receive wrong analysis and result.
solution is considering low area for each pices, thet is means increse the density of meshes, as asdfaaa Said.
 

costox

Full Member level 4
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Messages
196
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
1,539
To woshifanka:

Just want you to confirm that you want the airbox to be lambda/4 larger than the "MINIMUM LAMBDA".
I think it should be read: "lambda/4 larger than the HIGHEST LAMBDA (corresponding to the lowest frequency).
Am I correct ? The airbox has to be LARGE engough.
Thanks.
oxo
 

woshifanka

Full Member level 1
Joined
Jun 13, 2005
Messages
97
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
6
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
2,145
Dear costox : thank you for your advice. yes , its my fault.
rgz
 

antennas321

Member level 3
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Messages
63
Helped
15
Reputation
32
Reaction score
6
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
2,290
Even if you mesh the radiation boundary very well, you can get numerical errors that will lead to gain > directivity. I've seen radiation efficiencies slightly greater than one from HFSS antenna models that are adequately meshed.

I believe this stems from the fact that the FEM solves for the E-fields directly and then calculates H-fields and the currents and far-field quantities from H-fields. So some small numerical error may be difficult to remove when using this method.
 

costox

Full Member level 4
Joined
Mar 5, 2002
Messages
196
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
1,539
That's why you need to put in the setup analysis:
min convergence pass: 2
 

ifelix

Member level 1
Joined
Apr 4, 2006
Messages
41
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,763
Asdfaaa said:

Possible reasons:
1. in ur simulation model, metal loss is considered

I don't understand what it means...
If I consider metal loss I have efficiency=Rrad/(Rrad+Rloss) <1. And no problem exists...
In the case of pec efficiency = 100% and so I would have G=D...
Isn't it right?
 

asdfaaa

Full Member level 4
Joined
Aug 31, 2004
Messages
227
Helped
56
Reputation
112
Reaction score
14
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,530
ifelix said:
Asdfaaa said:

Possible reasons:
1. in ur simulation model, metal loss is considered

I don't understand what it means...
If I consider metal loss I have efficiency=Rrad/(Rrad+Rloss) <1. And no problem exists...
In the case of pec efficiency = 100% and so I would have G=D...
Isn't it right?
There was my type error, it should be "metal loss is not considered".

Regards,
 

Status
Not open for further replies.
Toggle Sidebar

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top