jiripolivka
Advanced Member level 5
- Joined
- May 21, 2010
- Messages
- 2,831
- Helped
- 832
- Reputation
- 1,662
- Reaction score
- 803
- Trophy points
- 1,393
- Location
- Santa Barbara
- Activity points
- 22,010
Up to now, in the mm-wave region, above say 50 GHz, there are several methods to generate noise, useful for calibration or creating noise fields:
1. Gas-discharge tubes matched to a waveguide: usually generate ENR (excess noise ratio) of 10-15 dB but need a high-voltage and high-power DC supply. Available from RF to ~400 GHz.
2. Avalanche-diode noise sources, in principle P/N junctions with reverse breakdown. Generate ENR of up to 30 dB, but less than 10 dB at >80 GHz. Poor performance above 80 GHz, not available above 100 GHz. Simple, low-power input, low-cost.
3. Using heated or cooled loads in a transmission line. Generate low ENR, like 400K against 300 K ambient, or, 77K (liquid nitrogen) against 300 K ambient. Very accurate and easy to use but need either liquid nitrogen (or hydrogen, or helium), or boiling water to function. Usable from DC to THz.
4. COLFET devices: FET or HEMT amplifiers "radiate" lower-than-ambient noise from their inputs while outputs are terminated. Usable at any frequency band where FET or HEMT amplifiers are available. ENR limited; e.g. at 23 GHz, generated noise temperature is ~70K, at 0 GHz, ~150 K. Useful to replace the cooled loads but barely available above 80-90 GHz.
5. In the THz frequency region, optical-fiber amplifiers were reported to generate a reasonable noise output, like 26 dB ENR over 300-330 GHz.
So far not available for 80- >100 GHz.
I would welcome anyone pointing out another technology suitable for >80 GHz, with ENR > 10 dB. Thank you all.
- - - Updated - - -
Please correct point 4 : at ~50 GHz, ~150 K. Thank you.
1. Gas-discharge tubes matched to a waveguide: usually generate ENR (excess noise ratio) of 10-15 dB but need a high-voltage and high-power DC supply. Available from RF to ~400 GHz.
2. Avalanche-diode noise sources, in principle P/N junctions with reverse breakdown. Generate ENR of up to 30 dB, but less than 10 dB at >80 GHz. Poor performance above 80 GHz, not available above 100 GHz. Simple, low-power input, low-cost.
3. Using heated or cooled loads in a transmission line. Generate low ENR, like 400K against 300 K ambient, or, 77K (liquid nitrogen) against 300 K ambient. Very accurate and easy to use but need either liquid nitrogen (or hydrogen, or helium), or boiling water to function. Usable from DC to THz.
4. COLFET devices: FET or HEMT amplifiers "radiate" lower-than-ambient noise from their inputs while outputs are terminated. Usable at any frequency band where FET or HEMT amplifiers are available. ENR limited; e.g. at 23 GHz, generated noise temperature is ~70K, at 0 GHz, ~150 K. Useful to replace the cooled loads but barely available above 80-90 GHz.
5. In the THz frequency region, optical-fiber amplifiers were reported to generate a reasonable noise output, like 26 dB ENR over 300-330 GHz.
So far not available for 80- >100 GHz.
I would welcome anyone pointing out another technology suitable for >80 GHz, with ENR > 10 dB. Thank you all.
- - - Updated - - -
Please correct point 4 : at ~50 GHz, ~150 K. Thank you.