+ Post New Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Full Member level 5
    Points: 3,790, Level: 14

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    287
    Helped
    1 / 1
    Points
    3,790
    Level
    14

    Post simulation using Assura extraction Vs Calibre extraction

    Dear all,

    I design a simple LNA now. I have tried to use Assura and Calibre to do RC extraction. However, I find the post simulation result is quite large different in two extraction view. My LNA is working at 3GHz around.For the Assura RC extraction, the post layout simulation result gives LNA wokring at 2.9GHz. If the Calibre RC extraction was used in the post layout simulation, it gave 2.8GHz working frequency. It shifts much more compared with Assura extraction. Now, which extraction I should believe?

    Thanks

    •   Alt6th March 2011, 14:44

      advertising

        
       

  2. #2
    Advanced Member level 5
    Points: 26,720, Level: 39
    BigBoss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Turkey
    Posts
    3,816
    Helped
    1155 / 1155
    Points
    26,720
    Level
    39

    Re: Post simulation using Assura extraction Vs Calibre extraction

    Calibre extraction more accurate regarding to my experiences.But it totally depends on the technology that you would use.
    Because extraction rules are defined by your tech. file and it is dependent on its accuracy and definitions.



--[[ ]]--