Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
cadence is better, others are no good for seamless design. as youknow, circuit design, layoutdesign and spice/rf-simulation are continuous ,each study will affect to next stage, some case result will be feedbacked previous design. so seamless design. i preffer cadence(better no best)
Agilent ADS is really good for RF Layout... But I have never used it in chip level. It is better for RF circuit design, layout and rf matching. It also has tool kits for RF System design.
Cadence Virtuoso is one of the most popular tools for RFIC design (Cadence has many other EDA tools, so calling the tool kit just Cadence is ambiguous).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.