Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Timing delays - compiler directive delay_mode_zero

Status
Not open for further replies.

sujithchakra

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Apr 30, 2007
Messages
18
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,422
delay_mode_zero

Hi,

I have a synthesized design(netlist) which I simulated using Cadence NC-Verilog using compiler directive +delay_mode_zero and functionality seemed to be correct. Now I am using Xilinx ISE to synthesize and simulate the design. I have two questions here.


1)How can I simulate the synthesized design(netlist) ignoring the timing delays in Xilinx ISE because +delay_mode_zero compiler directive is not supported in Xilinx.

2)What should I do to make the design work when I simulate the netlist without ignoring the timing delays?

Please help.

Thanks,
Sujith Chakra
 

Timing delays

Answering 2nd Question,

- Take a design that meets design,
- backannotate SDF ( generating by STA tools) into simulator
- ensure that standard cell models have all the arcs/checks in specify block
- enable timing checks in simulator ( so that simulator corrupts output as per checks mentioned in specify block).
 

Re: Timing delays

Thank you rjainv for the quick response. I did not understand "Take a design that meets design" in your reply. Can you be more clear? which simulator are you talking about? Is it Xilinx ISE? I am trying to simulate it using Xilinx ISE 10.1 to implement it in an FPGA. Please help.

Sujith Chakra
 

Re: Timing delays

I meant, design should meet timing in STA tools, otherwise you would anyway see those violations in your simulations ( after annotating SDF generated by same STA tools) and simulation would fail.

Simulator can be any - VCS/NC-verilog/Modelsim etc, All support SDF backannotation, only the switches/options to do so are different.

I haven't worked in xilinx-ISE, but I am hoping that it would also support SDF backannotation. But since its a integrated tool, it might give you smarter way of simulating timing delays.
 
Re: Timing delays

Thank you for the reply rjainv. I shall try doing what you mentioned and see.

Thanks,
Sujith Chakra
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top