Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

How to get 3d field plots from a fully calculated HFSS project?

Status
Not open for further replies.

elektr0

Full Member level 5
Joined
May 2, 2006
Messages
279
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
3,374
Hello,

can somebody tell me how to get 3d field plots from a fully calculated hfss project.
The result menu does not provide something ???

Thanks.
elektr0
 

hfss questions

you have to select the geometry, and then right click\plotfields\... then you can select the fields you want.
 

    elektr0

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Re: hfss questions

thanks (you got 3 pts)

I have another question.
If I have already calculated modal scattering parameters,
is there a possiblity to get the terminal scattering paramters in post processing.

---

The edges of a waveguide port are set with dependency of the assumed boundary.
If I use radiation boundary on the port face, which boundary is used for the
port edges. PERFECT E ???
 

hfss questions

Hi,

I think that the modal parameters are the same as the terminal parameters as long as you have only one terminal per port. Otherwise, I do not think you can get the terminal parameters in a simple way

Usually the port edges is assumed as PEC or PMC since in all cases (closed wg, open wg, planar TL, ... ) the fields are concentrated in a certain region and very small around it, so the port edge does not really affect the results much. However, the best way to ensure it, is to use a port of certain size and then increase the size until further increase does not affect Z0 and gamma of the waveguide. However, this is very tedious and time consuming so I do not recommend it unless you really need very high accuracy. Also, take care of the limits of the fabrication and material properties, trying to perfect the model is not always a good idea. Try to make it a simple and efficient for prove of concept, not to get results exactly as measured.

best regards and thanks :)
Adel
 

Re: hfss questions

Hello elektr0,
Have u defined a radiation boundary? If u have, u have to also add the radiation setup to see radiation characteristics of the structure.. Hope this helps.

Ananth.
 

hfss questions

Why not first try some simulation examples as the tutorial says.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top