Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
When using frequency domain solver with tetrahedral mesh in CST, dispersive materials can not touch the open boundaries. That is, one can not simulate an infinitely long dispersive slab. I was wondering whether it is the same behavior with HFSS if one wants to continue dispersive materials in to...
Is it possible to force the frequency domain of CST MWS to use the material parameters (permittivity/permeability versus frequency )defined in a file or a list? I know that it is possible to load material parameters (permittivity/permeability versus frequency) from a file and use several fitting...
I just received the new version from CST. And I can't help myself to praise the improvements in this version. Multi-level sub-gridding is just phenomenal. I got incredible speed enhancements in certain simulations. I have one thing left in my wish list: MPI implementation!
It is very important how you model the metals. When making simulations at THz range you should use a realistic model for the material dispersions. You may start from Drude dispersion model.
Re: I cant Get the Masters Degree Because of HFSS, Please He
I have to agree with RFSimulator. CST has a much better eigensolver in my opinion. I have used it to obtain the eigenmodes of very complex structures. Though the simulation takes a lot of time, I am very happy with it.
I would suggest using AKS method. I would not expect that considering lossy metals as PEC would be much of a consequence when the frequency is so low. Please check my attached calculation.
Eigenmode solver can easily solve the modes of a periodic structure. So, I would not agree with your comment. As a matter of fact, I myself used CST eigenmode solver to calculate the band structure of a 2D photonic crystal. And the results agree quite well with the results of well known band...
I hope we will not have "google it" as an answer for our questions and as a suggestion. Otherwise, we would not have a reason to hang out in this forum.
I would suggest using Fortran (for the calculations) and MatFor (for plotting the results in real time). I myself am using C++ and the trial version of Matfor. You may learn more information on Matfor from www.ancad.com. It is really a very advanced scientific plotting library for C++ and fortran.
In my opinion, both terms are correct. J. D. Jackson, in Classical Electrodynamics, Ashcroft/Mermin, in Solid State Physics, Hecht, in Optics, use the term "index of refraction". While, Kittel, in Introduction to Solid State Physics, uses the term "refractive index". I myself like to use both terms.
Would you be so kind to provide us a list of supported programs? For instance, Some of my collagues and myself wonder whether CST MWS and Rsoft Fullwave are supported by the accelarator board? Also I do not see any information regarding the price
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
