Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
An absolute answer for this question doesn't exist, I believe. The major difference may be :
1. Cost of CCS a lot cheaper than h-tech C.
2. No Linker for CCS.
3. A lot of example programs included in the CCS package, and there are larger amount of software library in *.c format, i.e. in source code format for CCS.
4. hi-tech C supports pointer to function, but CCS cannot. Someone would argue that: "what is the big deal with pointer to functions!". Personally, I won't comment on this too much, until the moment I know how to create a compiler!
May be there are a lot more opinion other than these.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
