Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

skew for common clock path

chevuturi

Newbie level 6
Joined
Jan 5, 2024
Messages
14
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
127
do we have skew for common clock path ? if no why ? if yes how do we calculate ?
 
CCP is not affected by variations in fanout cap or driving strength or input threshold. There is another thread where this topic is being discussed and I mention crosstalk there. Crosstalk does matter because it is not constant from one edge to the next.

Yes, yada yada, all digital circuits are analog, but they are analyzed as digital circuits by the digital CTS tools that handle CPPR.
No retraction or rebuttal?
 
Hi Tony. You seem to have very limited knowledge of CPPR, throwing random terms from PCB design and whatever else you could find on VLSI websites about CTS and how STA works in a clock tree. This is *not* what OP is asking, you are muddying the water. On top of that, you have this continuous thing about a job at AMD?! I really don't get it but I will leave at that and put you on my ignore list moving forward. On other topics you seemed to have spewed even higher BS level with AI generated answers that are not exactly what I would call good.

For other forum users, please refer to kaz1 answer. You want deep insights into CPPR, Innovus documentation has a great chapter on it. Also worth reading is the (A)OCV derating behavior as it is intimately linked to CPPR. This is all you need to know.
Your opinions are false and your comments are inflammatory and unprofessional.

"skew as in clock skew from clock tree implementation: no. "
May be generally true for simple design but is patently false as a rule as I proved with examples. You seem to know little about the real world in CTS at 6 GHz speeds.

"CCP is not affected by variations in fanout cap or driving strength or input threshold. "


This is pure BS and then you deflect it to a crosstalk jitter discussion which can be relevant but fallacious negation of my truth.
Facts. The capture time varies with data voltage threshold and risetime therefore both skew and Common Clock Skew after corrections are both affected.
Capture time is the metric that determines skew after launch.

Your argumentums are fallacious.

BTW I was doing clock tree analysis before EDA tools existed and before you were born. I don't need any experience in Cadence tools to understand.
e.g. 68000 dual-port bit-slice 32 bit micro's with dual-port SCSI. with manual CTS
I designed a discrete UART before Motorola released the first IC and mine was fully functional. -40 to 70'C in the 70's. with high margins.

Please do avoid personal attacks. They don't look good on any professional. AMD reference was intended to be a joke with a bit of a jab.
Those who have done as I have can speak from experience not just cite theory.(with flaws)
 
Last edited:

LaTeX Commands Quick-Menu:

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top