Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
Re: mpeg-4 or h.264 which will dominate the compression worl
Hi,
I think both.
Reason is that they have slightly different markets.
For versatility MPEG4 has a much wider range. With 3D, Meshes, FBA and such features.
h.264, on the other hand, is a very good rectangular frame compressor that beats MPEG4 in compression/quality. I have heard that h.264 has been approved for HDTV (like MPEG2 was chosen for DVDs and DVB).
You should check out the excellent introductory book "H.264 and MPEG-4 Video Compression" that is available on this board for an excellent overview.
Judging from your previous posts, I can guess that you have studied the MPEG2 specs as well. This book will also answer your "what's the difference between MPEG2 and MPEG4 compression" question.
Re: mpeg-4 or h.264 which will dominate the compression worl
????
To my understanding H.264 is the same than MPEG4-AVC, an improved version of "classic" MPEG4 (ASP) with new technical resources but not a competitor with pros and cons beyond increased complexity. Am I wrong?
Re: mpeg-4 or h.264 which will dominate the compression worl
Completely agree with yousuf. MPEG-4 and H.264 really complement each other very well.
@turttle:
H.264 is another name for MPEG-4 AVC / Part 10. H.264 supports many new features as opposed to MPEG-4 Advanced Simple Profile too. Main features like multiple reference frames motion estimation, highly robust error resilience tools, variable block sizes, and so on. So definitely, H.264 surpasses the expectations provided by MPEG-4. As yousuf said, MPEG-4 will be more appropriate for synthetic coding, meshes, 3D, facial and the likes along with regular compression. But if H.,264 beats the compression efficiency of H.264 with rectangular frame support, then H.264 is on the go. And MPEG-4 for arbitrary shaped objects.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.