10kangstroms
Member level 5
That is not a cite of Miller's theorem. By cite, I mean a scholarly reference, such as the one I provided. Can you provide a cite that defines it differently? Mind you, I'm not asking for Jasmin's theorem.jasmin_123 said:10kangstroms said:Please post the exact form of Miller's theorem, and a cite for it. All references I have found totally ignore the alternate path around the amplifier.
Here you are:
1. Exact application of Meller's theorem.
For infinite f, the exact gain G =Vds/Vgs=1 (see the circuit of 21 Feb 2007 18:14); Co=C(1-1/G)=C(1-1/1)=0, and Vo=Vds=V1>0 (is not this effect of a zero?!).
2. Approximate application of Meller's theorem.
If you use an approximate (dc) gain: G<0, then Co=C(1-1/G)>0, and, for infinite f, Vo=0. This means no effect of zero.
Is not this simple?!
---
Miller's theorem does not fail; APPROXIMATION DOES!
I also fail to see how your description defines the location of the zero, as defined in **broken link removed** I provided.