Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Ku-band PLL Architecture: Prescalars or Multipliers

Status
Not open for further replies.

soumyabumba

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Aug 14, 2006
Messages
17
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,426
I am planning for two architectures-

1> working in low freq and using a doubler(×2) at the final output
2>using a divide-by-two(÷2) prescalar at the feedback after the vco

In which architecture phase noise will be LESS???

Also please see the attached document.It is an application note from Hittite.It says that using a prescalar actually IMPROVES the phase noise while a multiplier degrades it.Prescaling is same as dividing the frequency right?...so why we read in books that setting a higher value of N degrades the phase noise by 20logN?

Thanks :)
 

Attachments

  • selecting_prescalers_for_pll_synthesizers.pdf
    41.7 KB · Views: 103

Close to carrier phase noise will be similar. Phase noise at offsets behind PLL BW will be different because of VCO's with lower output frequensies have PN more than 6 dB lower. Perhaps PLL BW will be 100-500 kHz in your design. If your interests are up-to 100-500 kHz suggest don't use frequency multiplier (1st variant). Otherwise additionaly you have to design it.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top