Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

inductor simulation problem about vias in Momentum

Status
Not open for further replies.

rfkevin

Newbie level 4
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
7
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,337
momentum simulation

I got a problem when I use momentum to simulate inductor/transformer. My inductor spiral is at M6 and is connected to underpass at M5 through via5 in D5. So, my substrate setup is like this

------Strip m6 (thickness expansion down)
D5 [VIA] via5
------Strip m5

When I check the structure in 3D view, I found via5 starts from top surface of m5 to the top surface of m6. However, via5 is assumed inserted between top surface of m5 and the bottom surface of m6. I guess it is because "thickness expansion down" option of m6, which expand the dielectric layer with the same thickness of m6 and with the same permitivity of D5.

Does anyone have experience to solve this problem? Thanks.
 

simulating via momentum

You should substract the thickness of m6 by thickness of via5.

For example, if now your m6 thickness is a, and via5 thickness is x then you should change your m6 thickness to (a-x).
 

inductor simulation

I've aksed Agilent supporting engineer. He confirmed my set-up is correct and this "error" is result by Momentum. In fact, Momentum is 2-D simulator. So, when we use thickness expansion of metal trace, such "error" will happen. Anyway, the Momentum simulation results are close to those by Sonnet. Here is 3-D structure of the transformer I simulated. As shown in the picture, via8 (grey) is overlaid with M9 (green). But, actually, via8 should only reach to the bottom of M9.


 

after momentum simulation what next

did you try to simulate in EMDS? I often use EMDS because it's faster. However, I think Momemtum is more accurate than EMDS.
 

inductor momentum simulation

I haven't tried EMDS because we don't have license. Do they use the same engine?
 

momentum simulation problem

rfkevin,

Do you think it would make any difference that the via extends into the entire thickness of the top metal? I would have thought that it wouldn't make any difference because you have "metal intersecting metal" and the two become a single metal.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top