Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
Our company use xfab processes for development. We use xc06, xt06, xc035, xh035 and others. We have few successfully projects and some works in progress.
Details u can see on xfab.com. Other detailed information is confidential. U have any common questions?
I think XFAB process include devices with good parameters.
We didn't use xb06 yet. But xb06 is oldest XFAB process (Today 4.0 version) and well characterized. Take into account that some types of diode characterized only for reverse bias. There are special types of diodes for operation in forward bias. Also there are some bugs in model interface. For example, if u divide resistor by N spripes, this N don't sent to netlist, and contact resistance is calculated as for one resistor. It's prefered to place N resistors in schematic.
If u follow Process Specification, u'll have succ. project.
Regards.
I have used XFAB technology xb06, xb06pin and cx08, and I can say that models are very good. Schematic, post-layout simulations and measured data does not differ so much. Until now, I had only problem with dpin (photodiode) transient simulation.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
