ashish.mw
Full Member level 2
Hi all,
I have simulated a rectangular waveguide WR284 in HFSS with the WavePort 1 in excited state and input power of 1W. I wish to calculate the net power flow through input port (read Surface1) and output port (read Surface2).
I am using HFSS Field Calculate to find the power flow through the above two surfaces which is given by the closed surface integral of Poynting Vector.
The formula for power flow computation goes like:
Scl : Integrate(Surface(Surface1), Dot(Real(Poynting), SurfaceNormal))
and
Scl : Integrate(Surface(Surface2), Dot(Real(Poynting), SurfaceNormal))
But the above one yields very strange values that I could not comprehend.
Power through surface1 = -1.0113 W
Power through surface2 = 1.0128 W
I read somewhere that power flow computation works in case of incident plane wave excitation but I am using waveport. Can somebody confirm on this?
Please help in understanding the phenomenon.
Thanks.
I have simulated a rectangular waveguide WR284 in HFSS with the WavePort 1 in excited state and input power of 1W. I wish to calculate the net power flow through input port (read Surface1) and output port (read Surface2).
I am using HFSS Field Calculate to find the power flow through the above two surfaces which is given by the closed surface integral of Poynting Vector.
The formula for power flow computation goes like:
Scl : Integrate(Surface(Surface1), Dot(Real(Poynting), SurfaceNormal))
and
Scl : Integrate(Surface(Surface2), Dot(Real(Poynting), SurfaceNormal))
But the above one yields very strange values that I could not comprehend.
Power through surface1 = -1.0113 W
Power through surface2 = 1.0128 W
I read somewhere that power flow computation works in case of incident plane wave excitation but I am using waveport. Can somebody confirm on this?
Please help in understanding the phenomenon.
Thanks.