Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

concept regarding piezoresistivity

Status
Not open for further replies.

kishanb

Newbie level 5
Joined
Jun 10, 2012
Messages
9
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,327
Hi all
I have a doubt as the piezoresistivity does not change in (111) plane and is minimum in all directions why do we still use (100) wafer what are the advantages using (100) orientation and how do i reduce piezoresistivity in (100) ?

Thanks and Regards
Kishan.B
 

It kind of "is what it is". But I've seen people do things like
lay out critical bandgap resistors at 45 degrees for exactly
this reason (automotive guys in plastic packaging, the strain
would jack the reference voltage after trimming).

100 may be preferred because it gives better mobility for
MOS. Other axes were used for things like V-groove dielectric
isolation, back before wafer bonding existed, etc. The
resistor always gets picked last at the care-about dance.
 
(100) also is said to be the best orientation to prevent channelling - the undesirable traveling of longer distances of the implanted ions. Still, the ion implant ray usually will be inclined a few degrees against the vertical to further hinder the channeling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top