Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Building a multi-user Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum model using SIMULINK

Status
Not open for further replies.

Preethi21

Newbie level 2
Joined
Apr 24, 2014
Messages
2
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
26
I'm designing a multi user Direct sequence spread spectrum in SIMULINK as my project, with BPSK modulation, and I want to implement the technique of multi - user interference rejection using LMS equalizers. Basically I am connecting multiple users at the transmittter side, and picking one of them as my desired signal, trying to retrieve it back on the rceiver side, and calculating the error rate. I have used an AWGN channel. Below is the rough order of the blocks I used.
Data>bpsk modulator >product with pn seq ( spreading ) > digital filter > added with other users > awgn chanel > lms linear equalizer > product with desired usr's pn sequence ( despreading ) > digital filter > bpsk demodulator > error rate calculator
Below are the specifications I used.
Data generator : Bernoulii Sequence Generator, time period Tb = 0.6
Spreading code : PN sequence generator, time period Tc= 0.04
All filters used all Low pass, FIR filters, Rectangular window, Normalized frequency cut off = 0.95
LMS Linear equalizer : 16 taps, reference tap is 4
I used differenct generating polynomials for the PN sequence generators in each of the different user to distinguish them, also the data generator, i changed its Probability of Zero each time to distinguish the data also.
The error rate refuses to go below 0.3 and the worst part is, with every increase in the user, the error rate decreases, which is wrong. I am unable to trace the error in the design. I have posted a picture of the model for better understanding.

To summarize it, I have the following doubts :
1) why does the error rate decrease as my no of users increase ?
2) The Lowpass FIR filter gives the least error at 0.95 cutoff - is this nearing to an ALL pass filter ?
3) Does the equalizer contribute to the error ? Do I need to add additional blocks to this ?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    51.6 KB · Views: 75

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top