Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Antenna simulation problems in HFSS..

Status
Not open for further replies.

ananth

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Jun 29, 2004
Messages
113
Helped
56
Reputation
112
Reaction score
43
Trophy points
1,308
Location
India
Activity points
815
Hello everyone,
I'm relatively new to HFSS and am trying to simulate an antenna that works perfectly fine in ADS Momentum. The list of problems I'm facing are:

1. The antenna gives me 40 dB of return loss in Momentum but only 10 dB in HFSS. I thought it could be because of the infinite ground in ADS. I verified that and thts not the problem. Anything else anybody can think of?

2. The CPW port definition is a mystery to me. If one has to fiddle with the port size for the port impedance to get to whatever value, one could have the right CPW line and still not have the correct simulation results. Is this correct or is there another way to define the ports to have a particular impedance for a Tline?

3. I can write an equation in Momentum to find the input impedance values. Can this be done in HFSS?

4. Is there a thumb rule for the size of a radiation box that confines the circuit?

Thanks,
Ananth.
 

gernally momentum is not good at far field simulation.
you can look at example from hfss to define the port
 

radiation box size is not problem, result is same whatever you choose
 

Hello Ananth, if you want to define a radiation box, you should use a thickness of lamda/4 at least, howewer lambda/2 is better. You could use a PML boundary. Check the Topic "Convert a project from Designer 1.1 to HFSS, you can find some interesting info.
Sincerely
S.
 

i) Finite ground plane of CPW geometry, it will shift your passband and change your impedance behavior

ii) Finite extent of your dielectric layer?

iii) HFSS should give you the better simulation based on items i) & ii)
 

Thanks for the info everyone. The radiation boundary suggestion hekped out and I'm able to make my cct work now..
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top