Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Multiplexer Implementation

Status
Not open for further replies.
C

choonlle

Full Member level 2
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
126
Helped
20
Reputation
40
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,298
Location
AFRICA
Activity points
2,025
multiplexer implementation

What is the diff between implementation using 5 X 4-to-1 mux compare to 16-to-1 mux ?
Since the output is same but , what is the diff betweeon both of them??

Thanks!
 

multiplexer implementation

5 X 4-to-1 mux will have more control loading (loading on select pins)
compare to 16-to-1 mux also the input to output delay will be more.
If ur using descrete chips for muxex then PCB cost will be more in case of
5 X 4-to-1 mux.
Any comments welcome!
 

    C

    choonlle

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
nand_gates said:
5 X 4-to-1 mux will have more control loading (loading on select pins)
compare to 16-to-1 mux also the input to output delay will be more.
If ur using descrete chips for muxex then PCB cost will be more in case of
5 X 4-to-1 mux.
Any comments welcome!
Click to expand...


Hi,

Mux16to1 will has a lot of LUT compare to 5X4-to-1 mux.

5X4-to-1 mux much more smaller...

What your means by PCB cost will be increase?
What is the reason?

How about we implement to convert 4-to-1 mux into 3X 2-to-1 mux ?
Thanks for help...
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top