Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Dual Band WLAN Diplexer?

Status
Not open for further replies.

aaron_do

Member level 3
Joined
Dec 12, 2007
Messages
64
Helped
4
Reputation
8
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
1,878
Hi all,


in a dual-band WLAN, a diplexer is normally used after to combine the 2GHz and 5GHz bands after their FEMs. I'm just wondering why do we use a diplexer and not an SPDT? The two bands don't seem to operate concurrently...



thanks,
Aaron
 

a properly designed Diplex filter can have adequate Return Loss (>15dB) and transmission band loss (<0.2dB) and be cheaper and lower loss than a good SPDT RF switch with Pin diodes.
 

I see. I didn't realize a diplexer would be cheaper. Not sure about the lower loss though. Both are on the order of 0.5 dB. Also, its a waste because most FEMs already have a SPDT to cover TX/RX, so an SP4T would cover dual-band TX/RX with not much increase in the loss...


Aaron
 

Are you sure there's no functional reason for having a diplexer instead of a switch? I'm looking at the SE5516A from Skyworks, which is a dual-band FEM, and they still use a diplexer between the two PAs...
 

in a dual-band WLAN, a diplexer is normally used after to combine the 2GHz and 5GHz bands after their FEMs. I'm just wondering why do we use a diplexer and not an SPDT? The two bands don't seem to operate concurrently...

In any case, with a diplexer the receiver than search for base stations on both bands simultaneously (without switching).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top