Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Register Log in

Simulation results vs. measured ones

Status
Not open for further replies.
J

Javirulo

Newbie level 6
Joined
Oct 20, 2005
Messages
14
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Location
Spain
Activity points
1,399
I've just built a printed Ifa 2.4 - 5.5 dual band that I designed with MWO. Measured results are accurated ( more or less ) but simulating the same geometry with Zeland I've reach different results. The band in 2.4 doesn't seem to work in simulation ( but works OK in mesurement ), and I'd like to know which could be the reason of this disagreement. Thanks in advance
 

Hi, Javirulo: You can send me the .geo and .sim (containing the frequency of interest) to me. I can help you (jian@zeland.com).
 

    J

    Javirulo

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Thanks Jian :

It works perfectly, simulations with IE3D are even more accurated than the ones I obtained with MWO. Thank you very much, I was really blocked at this point.

Regards and have a nice week ;)
 

Hi, Javirulo: You are welcomed. I am glad that my suggestion works.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top