gbugh
Member level 5
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2013
- Messages
- 81
- Helped
- 1
- Reputation
- 2
- Reaction score
- 1
- Trophy points
- 1,288
- Location
- Fort Worth, Texas
- Activity points
- 2,234
If I have a switching quadrature demodulator with a differential input and I purposely set the H input at a slightly higher DC offset and the L input at a slightly lower DC offset then anytime my L.O.'s I and Q switching inputs are not each exactly 50% duty cycle it will cause my I and Q zero IF outputs to have a DC offset. If I integrate those offsets over a long time period, like 100 seconds (0.01Hz), and feed them into circuits that correct the duty cycles of the I and the Q square waves then I ought to be able to keep the duty cycles very close to 50%.
But if I have any LO bleed into the RF input then that would cause a DC offset in the output also and so the offset will drive the duty cycle correction slightly off 50% untill it nulls the LO bleed effects.
So assuming I have a small amount of LO bleed and the correction circuit nulled it out but as a consequence the duty cycle is now 49.95%/50.05%, then what adverse effects will that have on received RF signals? Is it like no big deal? I'm trying to visualize how it would effect any other incoming signals over an output bandwidth of like 2.5KHz or less for the I and the Q outputs and I can't think of how it would be a problem.
Is it correct that usually the whole reason a non 50% duty cycle is a problem is that it allows the LO or its harmonics to bleed through? So if I nulled out that bleed through then everything else should still work well, yes?
If I zero beat on a strong signal it still ought to have some output higher than the 0.01Hz correction response so it shouldn't cause the correction circuit to null it out, I think.
any feedback would be appreciated, thanks,
I could just not worry about a slight DC offset except I feel challeged to see if I can succeed at designing a receiver with a large gain and still have all the stages DC coupled, or at least with a lower frequency limit of 0.01Hz. Maybe it would be of some use to someone later. I'm already using zero drift op amps with no 1/f noise corner frequency after the mixer output.
73
AF5IE
But if I have any LO bleed into the RF input then that would cause a DC offset in the output also and so the offset will drive the duty cycle correction slightly off 50% untill it nulls the LO bleed effects.
So assuming I have a small amount of LO bleed and the correction circuit nulled it out but as a consequence the duty cycle is now 49.95%/50.05%, then what adverse effects will that have on received RF signals? Is it like no big deal? I'm trying to visualize how it would effect any other incoming signals over an output bandwidth of like 2.5KHz or less for the I and the Q outputs and I can't think of how it would be a problem.
Is it correct that usually the whole reason a non 50% duty cycle is a problem is that it allows the LO or its harmonics to bleed through? So if I nulled out that bleed through then everything else should still work well, yes?
If I zero beat on a strong signal it still ought to have some output higher than the 0.01Hz correction response so it shouldn't cause the correction circuit to null it out, I think.
any feedback would be appreciated, thanks,
I could just not worry about a slight DC offset except I feel challeged to see if I can succeed at designing a receiver with a large gain and still have all the stages DC coupled, or at least with a lower frequency limit of 0.01Hz. Maybe it would be of some use to someone later. I'm already using zero drift op amps with no 1/f noise corner frequency after the mixer output.
73
AF5IE