Aug 10, 2007 #1 C countmybones Junior Member level 3 Joined Mar 11, 2005 Messages 30 Helped 2 Reputation 4 Reaction score 2 Trophy points 1,288 Activity points 1,522 Hi, Why in measuring RF power, a commonly used reference is 50MHz? Why not 100MHz or 60MHz or 55MHz? Thanks.
Hi, Why in measuring RF power, a commonly used reference is 50MHz? Why not 100MHz or 60MHz or 55MHz? Thanks.
Aug 13, 2007 #2 S springf2000 Full Member level 6 Joined Jun 13, 2004 Messages 381 Helped 20 Reputation 40 Reaction score 2 Trophy points 1,298 Activity points 2,500 this is the HP's hobby and now it became a standard
Aug 15, 2007 #3 C cityu50395112 Newbie level 4 Joined Apr 6, 2006 Messages 6 Helped 0 Reputation 0 Reaction score 0 Trophy points 1,281 Activity points 1,309 It is related to efficiency of the RF system. For 50Ohm, it is balance the power efficiency in RF circuit and radiation efficiency in antenna.
It is related to efficiency of the RF system. For 50Ohm, it is balance the power efficiency in RF circuit and radiation efficiency in antenna.
Aug 16, 2007 #4 C Chest Member level 3 Joined Sep 18, 2006 Messages 67 Helped 2 Reputation 4 Reaction score 1 Trophy points 1,288 Activity points 1,756 see topic on . BR
Aug 17, 2007 #5 C countmybones Junior Member level 3 Joined Mar 11, 2005 Messages 30 Helped 2 Reputation 4 Reaction score 2 Trophy points 1,288 Activity points 1,522 Thanks for the replies, but I think the question is why 50MHz instead of why 50 Ohms.
Aug 18, 2007 #6 T tarek- Newbie level 6 Joined Sep 18, 2006 Messages 13 Helped 1 Reputation 2 Reaction score 0 Trophy points 1,281 Activity points 1,366 in architecture such as integer-n fhss (i.e. bluetooth), Fref must be equal to channel spacing (i.e. 1MHz), right? (how) does this requirement differ for fractional n Σ-Δ?
in architecture such as integer-n fhss (i.e. bluetooth), Fref must be equal to channel spacing (i.e. 1MHz), right? (how) does this requirement differ for fractional n Σ-Δ?