Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Why do we not consider Cgd4 in this differential pair?

Status
Not open for further replies.

mince

Member level 5
Joined
Feb 19, 2005
Messages
82
Helped
10
Reputation
20
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
1,288
Location
Texas
Activity points
1,894
In the differential pair in the picture, the second pole is equal to gm3/Cx where Cx is the total capacitance in node X to ground. It is approximated to be Cgs3+Cgs4. Why do we not consider Cgd4? For small lengths, wont the miller effect from the gate to drain of M4 cause this capacitance to be on the order of the gate-source capacitances?
 

nandu_r

Member level 1
Joined
Aug 31, 2005
Messages
32
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
1,589
Re: Diff pair question

cgd capacitance is the overlap capacitance, and for smaller length , the gain is not much, so that part is usualy neglected
 

willyboy19

Full Member level 3
Joined
Feb 15, 2004
Messages
152
Helped
12
Reputation
24
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
1,705
Re: Diff pair question

Cgd4 does not need to be accounted for the pole at Cgs3 and Cgs4, this is because a pole-zero doublet happens before the Cgd4 Miller cap can take effect.
 

philipwang

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Mar 30, 2005
Messages
102
Helped
13
Reputation
26
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Sz China
Activity points
2,161
Re: Diff pair question

Actually we negleted these capacitance:
Cgb3, Cgd1, Cgb1, Cgd4, 'b' indicates bulk.

Bg,

mince said:
In the differential pair in the picture, the second pole is equal to gm3/Cx where Cx is the total capacitance in node X to ground. It is approximated to be Cgs3+Cgs4. Why do we not consider Cgd4? For small lengths, wont the miller effect from the gate to drain of M4 cause this capacitance to be on the order of the gate-source capacitances?
 

rockycheng

Member level 5
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
91
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
864
Re: Diff pair question

mince said:
Cx is the total capacitance in node X to ground.

I think you have answered the question by yourself. Cgd4 is not connected to ac ground. :|
 

mince

Member level 5
Joined
Feb 19, 2005
Messages
82
Helped
10
Reputation
20
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
1,288
Location
Texas
Activity points
1,894
Re: Diff pair question

rockycheng said:
mince said:
Cx is the total capacitance in node X to ground.

I think you have answered the question by yourself. Cgd4 is not connected to ac ground. :|

But due to the miller effect, there is an equivalent capacitance between the gate and AC ground that is equal to (1+gm4*ro4||ro2)*Cgd4. Since Cgs is equal to 2/3*WLCox and Cgd=Ld*W*Cox, if Ld*(1+gm4*ro4||ro2) is close to or bigger than L, then the gate drain capacitance can affect our second pole, or am I doing the analysis wrong?
 

rockycheng

Member level 5
Joined
Feb 4, 2005
Messages
91
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
864
Diff pair question

Yes you are right about the miller capacitance. The problem is that you are considering the Cx, which is the total capacitance from node X to the ac ground, as you said. Although Cgd4 is large duo to the miller effect, this value should be parallel with (Cdb2+Cdb4). The result is that it is negligible.
 

fendy

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Oct 27, 2005
Messages
29
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,481
Re: Diff pair question

The Miller effect is Z1=Z/[1-(-Av)].
The gain is so huge,so the Cgd4 & Cgd1 can be neglected.
If the gain enough small,the Cgd4 & Cgd1 cann't be neglected.
FYI
 

wanily1983

Member level 5
Joined
Mar 22, 2005
Messages
92
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
2,123
Diff pair question

in prof.RAZAVI's book, Cx is include the Cgd4, when all transistor work in saturation region, Cgd is very very small ,which is Cov*w, while Cgs is 2/3*W*Leff*Cox. even if the gain is large,the effect of Cgd can be neglected.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top