Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Why and when do we introduce the "d" term

Status
Not open for further replies.

SanjKrish

Member level 3
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
67
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,288
Location
India
Activity points
1,855
This is bit tricky and may sound weird but somehow I have tried to express my doubt..

While I was reading the work done by capacitor in Wikipedia, i came across an eqn

dW = (q/C)dq followed by the statement
"Moving a small element of charge dq from one plate to the other against the potential difference V = q/C requires the work dW"

Now my question is why do we introduce the term dW instead of just W.
If u tel me" because it is small element of charge, and so we introduce the dq n dW term instead of q or W", then does it mean it is not applicable for large element.
What is the need to integrate this eqn in order to get the value for W.

I have come across many such terms in electronics where we introduce this derivative d term signifying its a small element.. but why it has to be like that and not the normal conventional symbol...
 
Last edited:

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top