Which version of what tool to support SystemVerilog3.1a?

[AlexWan]

Hi all
Now, which EDA vendor is release the new version of tool to support the systemverilog3.1a??

 

[visualart]

synopsys
Program can gain early access to Synopsys' SystemVerilog-based tools, such as VCS™ and HDL Compiler, the front-end language compiler for Design Compiler™, for development and support of their respective SystemVerilog tools, IP and training products. By participating in the SystemVerilog Catalyst Program, member companies can help provide their customers with a more effective path to interoperability with Synopsys' SystemVerilog-based tools and Accellera SystemVerilog language.

 

[aji_vlsi]

Hi all
Now, which EDA vendor is release the new version of tool to support the systemverilog3.1a??

I think all the three major vendors (SNPS, MENT, CDN) have some support. AFAIK, SNPS leads it, followed by MENT (Questasim) then Cadence - but things are changing as we speak. Check with your vendor.

Regards
Ajeetha, CVC

 

[vipulsinha]

I think all the three major vendors (SNPS, MENT, CDN) have some support. AFAIK, SNPS leads it, followed by MENT (Questasim) then Cadence - but things are changing as we speak. Check with your vendor.

Apart from that Model sin XE 6.1d supports it

regards vips

 

[Johnson]

Questa Sim support most of LRM

 

[woodyplum]

VCS of cause

 

[dada]

modesim supports only design specific constrcuts of systemverilog. questasim supports almost full LRM and is way ahead of cadence and synopsys

 

[aji_vlsi]

modesim supports only design specific constrcuts of systemverilog. questasim supports almost full LRM and is way ahead of cadence and synopsys

All,
It will surely help all of us - the tech community, to quantify when we say "way ahead of xyz". Is there a list of constructs/context which one supports better than others? For example:

Interface + Modport + Clocking block support.
Program, Multiple programs
VMM kind of heavy OOP based code.

I would not get into who is better as I've NDA with more than one vendor, but for us to say "one is ahead of other" we would need a quantification IMHO.

Regards
Ajeetha, CVC