Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Which PCB tool to choose?

Status
Not open for further replies.

miho

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Dec 1, 2003
Messages
31
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
448
dxdesigner sucks

I know, this topic has been beaten to death, but anyway... Maybe I can get some serious hints when specifying some constraints...

I am looking for a PCB tool which suits the following:

boards up to 14 layers with high speeds
fine pitch BGA components (e.g. FPGAs)
readily available libraries
signal integrity simulation might become an issue soon

We are a small start-up, but not a board design company, just developing our own hard- and software. Cost is an issue. $5-7k would be ok.

We had boards made by suppliers who used Protel and hand-routing, would Specctra save us time with good auto-routing results?

Considering Protel's price tag and the fact that OrCad is about the same, we are wondering id Orcad would be the better choice. What about Mentor's Pads?

Any thoughts are appreciated
miho
 

Cluricaun

Advanced Member level 2
Joined
Sep 28, 2001
Messages
627
Helped
17
Reputation
34
Reaction score
7
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
3,315
cadpack pcb

Hi

There are some discussions about different PCB software at this forum, search there and you might get some hints.
Besides the normal routing softwares I think you could try Electra, and Proteus is also quite good, I do not know for 14 Layers though.

The electra is similar to Specctra, except the price.

123.labcenter.co.uk
123.connecteda.com/
123.pulsonix.com/

123=www

Cluricaun
 

mrcube_ns

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Apr 10, 2002
Messages
452
Helped
48
Reputation
96
Reaction score
34
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Europe
Activity points
3,814
multiple vias cadstar

In firm where I was working last year I used Pcad2001 with Specctra autorouter.

This combination works very nice.


Mr.Cube
 

binu G

Advanced Member level 2
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Messages
501
Helped
12
Reputation
24
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Bangalore
Activity points
3,782
interface cadstar specttra

mrcube_ns said:
In firm where I was working last year I used Pcad2001 with Specctra autorouter.

This combination works very nice.


Mr.Cube

ya thats the best option to get the job complet faster and effective.
but one should know how to define the rules in specctra.

binu g
 

C8H10N4O2

Newbie level 6
Joined
May 13, 2004
Messages
13
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
116
signal integrity freeware spectraquest

Protel and OrCad are both integrated solutions. You can easily go between PCB and schematic. PADS and PCAD are more geared toward board design. Thus, for pure board design, PADS and PCAD are likely to be slightly better and for system level design, Protel and OrCad might offer better integration.
 

AN

Member level 2
Joined
Apr 28, 2001
Messages
45
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
256
specctra for pulsonix

please don't say that Orcad is good for beginner!!!!
Layout is a worst tool which I use!!!
AN
 

rauol

Full Member level 6
Joined
Oct 2, 2002
Messages
325
Helped
16
Reputation
32
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
1,298
Location
India
Activity points
2,647
cadstar multiple vias

8) try Pulsonix, easy interface,quick learning curve. i have used its evaluation version.
www.pulsonix.com
 

AltEdward

Newbie level 1
Joined
May 20, 2004
Messages
1
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
8
dxdesigner .ini files

strongly recommend use Cadence/Allergo..
 

tlp71@hotmail.com

Full Member level 4
Joined
May 14, 2002
Messages
220
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
1,596
invoking boardstation re is very slow

allegro is a good tool.
You can use many feature to accelerate your work.
 

ynhe

Full Member level 3
Joined
May 28, 2001
Messages
184
Helped
6
Reputation
12
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Location
China
Activity points
1,346
visula layout

PADS2004 is good.
It include schematic capture,analog and mixture signal spice simulation(intusoft icap8.1.x),Hyperlynx simulation and so on.


ynhe
 

skywalker

Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Nov 27, 2001
Messages
119
Helped
5
Reputation
10
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Earth
Activity points
1,072
purchasing eda software

Hi miho,

for cost at $5-7k i think PADS are best choice, no problem for 14 layers,
no problem for working with h--speed rules and simulation !

Pcb, schematic, Hyp*er*Linx, are very affirmed tools ! Like no others remeber, at same (low<->medium) cost off-course ! But they work really well !

Best of PADS, but not same costs, 1st Exp*edi*tion 2nd All*egro tools.

let me know, Skywalker.
 

prokopec

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Feb 13, 2003
Messages
28
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
213
reannotation diptrace

I use PADS too, PADS is very good.

Daniel
 

SphinX

Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Jan 25, 2002
Messages
822
Helped
58
Reputation
116
Reaction score
29
Trophy points
1,308
Location
EGYPT
Activity points
7,051
cadence orcad terrible

Hi,

I use OrCAD.
OrCAD Capture is very good but OrCAD LAYOUT doesn't :-(
I will use PCAD 2002 in conjuction with Capture.

SphinX
 

bigrice911

Member level 3
Joined
Apr 27, 2004
Messages
65
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
500
protel disadvantage

maybe Cadence Allegro is your best choice, but Mentor WG will be a good option too.
 

miho

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Dec 1, 2003
Messages
31
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
448
electra autorouter integration with orcad

seems like there are still plenty of choices and no real winner since everybody has his/her personal preference... :)

cadence allegro seems a bit too big for us, we will not make use of the ic-pcb codesign feature, i think. i am wondering a bit why cadence has two tools in the market, are they gonna merge them at some time since they bought orcad a while ago?
 

sudeepb

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Jul 17, 2002
Messages
16
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
118
kicad converter powerpcb

I am using Orcad Capture for Circuit design and Cadstar for PCB layout which really comes good.
Orcad with Spectra is also good one.
 

Jaannee

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Dec 31, 1999
Messages
26
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
255
dxdesigner stinks

Hi!
I have worked with both Pads and Cadstar and must say that Pads stinks in comparison. (And Cadstar has the most beautiful support for hand-routing)

I have also worked some with Orcad and I agree with earlier post that it may not be the best choice for the not so experienced.

It´s like allways, taste differs...


/Janne
 

sinatra

Full Member level 4
Joined
Mar 29, 2002
Messages
214
Helped
18
Reputation
36
Reaction score
7
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Neverland
Activity points
2,842
kicad build in lib power

Hello all.
How about the free tools? There are not very many arround but there are some.
Has anyone tryed PCB (an old tool from unix that is now available also in windows under cygwin emulation)? PCB seems to be a quite good pcb tool.
For the schematics there are gnuEDA and Xcircuit.
There's also a free circuit simulator that is part of gnuEDA.
All those tools are completely free, no license etc...
Can they already compete with the commercial ones?????
S.
 

eternal_nan

Full Member level 3
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
156
Helped
26
Reputation
52
Reaction score
11
Trophy points
1,298
Location
eternity
Activity points
1,412
visula

I find OrCAD to be a satisfactory tool for the most part. The schematic capture is nicer than Protel's, the layout is more or less the same quality (unless you get allegro, in which case it is better). Protel has built in signal integrity simulation, but it is not "industrial grade". Protel's autorouter generally does a better job than orcad's and is overall quite good for boards >6 layers, after that it is not that good and Specctra becomes worth it.

Maybe Protel+Specctra is the best way to go, given your potential signal integrity simulation needs.
 

miho

Junior Member level 3
Joined
Dec 1, 2003
Messages
31
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
448
pcb 123 libraries for linx

@ eternal_nan: You are saying that the simulation is not industrial grade. well, so far we got our boards running without simulation but will this simulation help at all in the future? ok, if the simulation indicates a problem, there probably really is a big one, but if it indicates no problem, there still might be one, right?

I am wondering if that non-industrial-grade simulation is worth anything at all... Any experiences with that, anyone?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top