Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

which one is more matching for these two layouts?

Status
Not open for further replies.

chang830

Full Member level 5
Full Member level 5
Joined
Feb 11, 2006
Messages
267
Helped
14
Reputation
28
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
3,424
Hi,
Would you pls. take a look at the attached two layouts? It is a 1:2 current mirrors.I hope to lay it with common-centeroid to make good matching.I used the two layout, but I don't know which one is more maching?

For the 1st one, it is matched for the Drain and source of the M1&M2.The signal line is also macthing.

But for the 2nd one,it is more like a common centroid maching.

Would anyone pls. tell me which one is more macthing?

Thanks
 

extraord

Member level 4
Member level 4
Joined
Mar 5, 2004
Messages
68
Helped
8
Reputation
16
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
553
in deep submicro <0.18um first is much better, absolutly
 

    chang830

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating

safwatonline

Advanced Member level 4
Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
1,341
Helped
219
Reputation
438
Reaction score
48
Trophy points
1,328
Location
EGYPT
Activity points
9,038
Hello extraord,
can u elaborate more.
isnt both common centroid ?
as far as i know the matching happens from placement of the device so that when doped they have nearly the same effective doping ratio, which means that placment is enough for the matching , then if D and S are replaced then it doesnt matter which one is which as they r supposed to be identical ?
plz correct me if i am wrong
regards,
a.safwat
 

Hughes

Advanced Member level 3
Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
715
Helped
113
Reputation
226
Reaction score
26
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
5,984
The first one is more like a common centroid -- For the first one, the Drains are common centroid, the Sources are common centroid, and the Gates are common centroid.

The first one is better in matching, at least not worse than the second one.
 

    chang830

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating

jcpu

Full Member level 4
Full Member level 4
Joined
Dec 17, 2005
Messages
214
Helped
18
Reputation
36
Reaction score
5
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,968
Hello:

1st one is closer to common practice.
Reason is that recently we tend to look at MOS matching
from ION implantation point o view.
This is slowly varying profile, hence fig.1 tends to average better.

However, my suggestion is
to add dummy at left and right end to avoid abnormal etching
at the boundary.

Good luck,
 

    chang830

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating

longstar

Member level 2
Member level 2
Joined
Dec 12, 2005
Messages
52
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,286
Activity points
1,709
Jcpu is right.you can get better match if you add dummy to make the circumstance between M21 and M22 be uniform.Surely,the first is better than the second.
 

safwatonline

Advanced Member level 4
Advanced Member level 4
Joined
Nov 19, 2005
Messages
1,341
Helped
219
Reputation
438
Reaction score
48
Trophy points
1,328
Location
EGYPT
Activity points
9,038
hi,
i dont see the use of a dummy we r not etching and cause the MOST most probably will have a region surrounding the active area that already acts as a dummy region
 

pixel

Advanced Member level 2
Advanced Member level 2
Joined
Sep 16, 2004
Messages
508
Helped
69
Reputation
138
Reaction score
16
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
3,993
just imagine that fabrication maski is slightly shifted left(or right), and see what happens with drain and source areas for all three mosfets....
1st is better
 

extraord

Member level 4
Member level 4
Joined
Mar 5, 2004
Messages
68
Helped
8
Reputation
16
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,288
Activity points
553
the source and drain are not the same, in modern process.
the foundary usually do LDD in source and drain, so the plasma is not
absolut vertical. although they shift the wafer around to make the source and
drain doping similar, they are still different.
 

vilas_nakade

Newbie level 3
Newbie level 3
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
4
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,306
First one will give better matching because matching depends on placement and current direction. Since in first case current flow in same direction i.e. from left to right.
 

jolia

Junior Member level 2
Junior Member level 2
Joined
Aug 17, 2006
Messages
20
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,391
the first one is better
 

drasta

Junior Member level 3
Junior Member level 3
Joined
Sep 15, 2004
Messages
26
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
1,283
Activity points
221
It is true than on first currents flow in the same direction but if you shift mask I dont see how first can be better because than M21 and M22 will have smaller D than S or vice versa but on the figure 2 shifting will afect the same D and S. So be carefull.
 

Hughes

Advanced Member level 3
Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
715
Helped
113
Reputation
226
Reaction score
26
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
5,984
drasta said:
It is true than on first currents flow in the same direction but if you shift mask I dont see how first can be better because than M21 and M22 will have smaller D than S or vice versa but on the figure 2 shifting will afect the same D and S. So be carefull.
If you shift mask, M2 in Fig.2 will still have balanced D and S while M1 not. In Fig.1, both M1 and M2 will have unbalanced D and S. So matching is better in Fig.1.

Fig.2 has a "better matching" between S and D of M2, but not between M1 and M2.
 

sankudey

Full Member level 3
Full Member level 3
Joined
Sep 6, 2005
Messages
176
Helped
37
Reputation
74
Reaction score
11
Trophy points
1,298
Location
India
Activity points
3,513
OK....
I have another opinion...

What we are talking abt is the averaging of variation in the horizontal direction only...
From that....I guess first one is preferable....and symmetric too....

But what abt vertical variations....u can see the area looks like rectengular....

I propose...to brak the M2 in four parts...M21...M22...M23...M24.....and put four of the transistors ..either at the diagonal of the M1 or just at horizontal/vertical axix.....generally done in BandGap reference....

May be ..it will take large are....but matcjing will be better..in my opinion....

sankudey
 

k_90

Full Member level 2
Full Member level 2
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
141
Helped
27
Reputation
54
Reaction score
9
Trophy points
1,298
Location
Scotland,GB
Activity points
2,137
This is the correct way to lay out a current mirror !!!

Please find a power point presentation.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top