Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
I guess MWO is much more user friendly and you could quickly adapt easily. But still, it depends on the type of applications you're going to use them for...
M/W/O and E/a/g/l/e/w/a/r/e are both easy to use. M/W/O has the better system and E/M/ simulator. E/a/g/l/e/w/a/r/e has the better filter synthesizer (and PLL, too). @/D/S is the hardest to use and its circuit synthesizers are from the dark ages. If you are just getting started, try the student version of A/n/s/o/f/t S/e/r/e/n/a/d/e. Its free.
generally speaking ads and mwo is better than genesys but of course, you pay a few times more than you pay for genesys. If you do not need these for high frequency, i.e., above 10 GHz, you can use genesys at a fraction of the ads price.
By the way, Genesys is catching up very fast. Soon it will match the other two but with a lower price. Also at RF frequency, it is a good software to start with.
Gene$y$ is a combination of misc tools.
MW0 is general tools,
AD$ is a complex and delux platform
it has been integrated into $PECTA RF
$erenade is a good circuit simulater.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.