Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

what do the the finger and multiplicity do in ic5141?

Status
Not open for further replies.

urian

Full Member level 3
Full Member level 3
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
154
Helped
10
Reputation
20
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,499
hi,there
i find that there are "Number of fingers" and "Multiplicity" options in "Edit Object properties" box of virtuoso.
what does this mean?

in my option,they are both timing the W in the W/L expression.but the simulation result shows that it seems wrong.
then what the exact meaning of them?
if i want to increase the W/L ratio, whether should i increase the finger number, or the multiplicity number?

Best regards
urian
 

leozuo

Newbie level 6
Newbie level 6
Joined
Mar 13, 2010
Messages
13
Helped
1
Reputation
2
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Location
USA
Activity points
1,334
usually I use multiplier. But I do not know what do fingers do either..
 

JoannesPaulus

Advanced Member level 3
Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
773
Helped
235
Reputation
470
Reaction score
138
Trophy points
1,323
Location
USA
Activity points
5,006
Let's say that you have a 100um wide transistor. If you set the number of fingers (n) to 10 and the multiplier (m) to 1, your transistor will have one 100um wide device composed by ten 10um transistors abutted together (they share every other drain-source connection)
If you set n=10 and m=2, you will have two 50um wide devices composed by ten 5um wide transistors abutted together.
It does make a difference! Especially if you are using a sub-micron technology...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Andreew and pcca

    urian

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating

    pcca

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating

    Andreew

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating

oversea

Newbie level 6
Newbie level 6
Joined
Oct 15, 2009
Messages
13
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,375
JoannesPaulus said:
Let's say that you have a 100um wide transistor. If you set the number of fingers (n) to 10 and the multiplier (m) to 1, your transistor will have one 100um wide device composed by ten 10um transistors abutted together (they share every other drain-source connection)
If you set n=10 and m=2, you will have two 50um wide devices composed by ten 5um wide transistors abutted together.
It does make a difference! Especially if you are using a sub-micron technology...

so which one is better?
 

rfsystem

Advanced Member level 3
Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Feb 25, 2002
Messages
910
Helped
149
Reputation
294
Reaction score
37
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Germany
Activity points
9,548
The finger versus multiplicity have very clear context:

"Finger" mean a specific layout arrangement with n gate fingers where source and drain diffusion areas are shared. If you have n fingers you will have n+1 diffusions. So devil in the detail now is that you can assign either to the source or drain one more diffusion when the fingeris an even number.

The multiplicity is simple the parallel connection of multiple MOS devices.

More complex layout arrangements assume also 2D arrays of gate fingers. The more complex models take also specific parasitics into account.

For the design process that is a good way because you can have a very near physical model and the device layout process is automated.
 

    urian

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating

urian

Full Member level 3
Full Member level 3
Joined
Sep 3, 2009
Messages
154
Helped
10
Reputation
20
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
2,499
thanks,guys
my tutor told me that i should set multiplicity to 1 and only to change the finger to attain large W/L ratio,i doubt whether it is right.
 

rfsystem

Advanced Member level 3
Advanced Member level 3
Joined
Feb 25, 2002
Messages
910
Helped
149
Reputation
294
Reaction score
37
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Germany
Activity points
9,548
That advice is right because it is near the physical values of the layout.

Sometimes the maximum finger lenght which is equal to the width of the MOS device is limited by design rules.

How that is handled is depend on the property editor and the underlying callback routines.
 

    urian

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top