Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

WARNING:Xst:1336 - (*) More than 100% of Device resources are used

Status
Not open for further replies.

dksagra

Junior Member level 1
Joined
Jul 26, 2010
Messages
19
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Location
india
Activity points
1,493
hi,
i am facing this problem mentioned below in the utilization summary..
i have made filter code in system generator then generate vhd for the
same.
when i am running this vhd code in ISE and synthesis, i am receiving
this warning..
how can i remove this warning?



Device utilization summary:
---------------------------
Selected Device : 5vlx110tff1136-1


Slice Logic Utilization:
Number of Slice LUTs: 7621 out of 69120 11%
Number used as Logic: 7621 out of 69120 11%

Slice Logic Distribution:
Number of LUT Flip Flop pairs used: 7621
Number with an unused Flip Flop: 7621 out of 7621 100%
Number with an unused LUT: 0 out of 7621 0%
Number of fully used LUT-FF pairs: 0 out of 7621 0%
Number of unique control sets: 0

IO Utilization:
Number of IOs: 9458
Number of bonded IOBs: 9458 out of 640 1477% (*)

Specific Feature Utilization:

WARNING:Xst:1336 - (*) More than 100% of Device resources are used
 

BradtheRad

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Apr 1, 2011
Messages
14,240
Helped
2,816
Reputation
5,640
Reaction score
2,757
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
Activity points
106,224
Number of bonded IOBs: 9458 out of 640 1477% (*)

This suggests too many inputs and/or outputs being used, if 640 is the limit.

However you are using the other categories within limits.

Are all your I/O lines listed separately, making them tally 9458?
Could it be that you will reduce the count by grouping associated I/O lines under a shared node?
A syntax problem?
Etc.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top