Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Using tri-state implementation to reduce area

Status
Not open for further replies.

gold_kiss

Full Member level 4
Joined
Sep 11, 2002
Messages
211
Helped
7
Reputation
14
Reaction score
4
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
1,789
Hi,
In the AMBA specs says
"Using tri-state implementation to reduce area"
can anyone justify how exactly are we optimising on area when we use a tristate design.

Thanks,
Gold_kiss
 

There are no Master->Slave and slave-> muxes in Tristate buses.
 

AMBA is a uni direction bus architecture right?
 

There are two methods to implement bus.
One is mux, the other is tri-state.
MUX area is bigger than tri-state, but eazier to control.
For your reference.
 

Hey guys where does the tri state comes in picture in AMBA specs, Please specify.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top