niki
Member level 4
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2002
- Messages
- 70
- Helped
- 20
- Reputation
- 40
- Reaction score
- 20
- Trophy points
- 1,288
- Location
- Switzerland
- Activity points
- 418
The slope with 4.5dB has a ripple of 0.05dB! As motivation I included the plot with tolerances of +-2% for all elements in the LC network.Does network theory consider labour cost of 0% tolerances and specs for group delay error and yet has 4.5dB slope with 2.5dB ripple hmm. , so component error tolerance also demands margin to meet this spec. 10th order Chebychev? Sorry I'm not familiar with methods they teach you, but there are many simple programs but not for this. e.g. active filters from ti.com and LC filters from falstad https://tinyurl.com/y9shwbhh
First read and understand the problem correctly and then make recommendations.
As motivation I included the plot with tolerances of +-2% for all elements in the LC network.
The specification is somewhat challenging so that a standard off-the-shelf solution is not simply possible (missing in most engineers' curricula). But the filter can also be realized with lossy elements. The plot again shows the yield analysis with lossy elements.Specification and results looks a bit theoretical to me. Have you included finite Q for real world components?
Not quite right. It also works with a lossless LC network.The gain slope part of the filter can't be effectively implemented with standard band pass topologies, it's demanding for equalizer topologies like staggered pole-zero pairs.
Not quite right. It also works with a lossless LC network.
Finally someone mentions the connections between reflection and transmission in a lossless LC network. Of course this gives a great reflection... the power has to go somewhere. The user must decide whether he can live with it or whether another solution is necessary.If you realize the 4.5dB slope with a lossless network, this will cause (heavy) mismatch in the pass band, which isn't acceptable in most cases.
But it seems that you want our attention for your design methodology, so please go ahead.
If you realize the 4.5dB slope with a lossless network, this will cause (heavy) mismatch in the pass band, which isn't acceptable in most cases.
But it seems that you want our attention for your design methodology, so please go ahead.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?