Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Theory behind S parameters

Status
Not open for further replies.

tronixbug

Newbie level 6
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
14
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1,281
Activity points
1,365
can s12 be used as a parameter which specifies the transmission coefficient?
can this formula be used for the gain
gain=20logl(s12)l
and
insertion loss=-20logls12l

with input VSWR as high as 30:1 can the device operate efficiently
 

boy

Advanced Member level 1
Joined
Sep 30, 2002
Messages
481
Helped
96
Reputation
192
Reaction score
55
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Thailand
Activity points
3,963
s parameters

There are 3 sections of gain. S11, S21 and S22 (assume that S12 = 0). For the detail, you can look at Gonzalez's book. generally, S21 will be the gain if both S11 and S21 are matched for maximum gain. Also it depends on where do you measured.
 

pit

Full Member level 4
Joined
Jun 5, 2002
Messages
201
Helped
44
Reputation
88
Reaction score
35
Trophy points
1,308
Activity points
1,858
Re: s parameters

tronixbug said:
can s12 be used as a parameter which specifies the transmission coefficient?

Forward transmission coefficient is S21, not S12! Only on a fully passive two-port device with only isotropic materials S21 and S12 are reciprocal (theoretically). For example if you have ferrite beads S21 and S12 are not reciprocal any longer.

In general:

S11: input port voltage reflection coefficient
S21: forward voltage gain
S12: reverse voltage gain
S22: output port voltage reflection coefficient

You may have a look here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scattering_parameters

with input VSWR as high as 30:1 can the device operate efficiently

This is awfully bad, matching should not exceed 1.5:1, depending on application. You should do something about matching here. Of course 30:1 is far far away from being efficient.



CU
 

DDavid

Full Member level 5
Joined
Apr 6, 2006
Messages
305
Helped
49
Reputation
98
Reaction score
27
Trophy points
1,308
Activity points
2,986
Re: s parameters

Next articel will answer to you question
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top