Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

The Verilog PLI is Dead (maybe) Long Live the SystemVerilog

Status
Not open for further replies.

jimjim2k

Advanced Member level 3
Joined
May 17, 2001
Messages
996
Helped
23
Reputation
46
Reaction score
13
Trophy points
1,298
Activity points
7,178
Hi

I have found the title of an award-winning paper
from SUNG San Jose 2004:

"The Verilog PLI is Dead (maybe) Long Live the SystemVerilog"


Please search for it:

1. h**p://www.snug-universal.org/papers/papers.htm

* -> t



Who has it?
Who readed it?


tnx
 

Re: The Verilog PLI is Dead (maybe) Long Live the SystemVeri

jimjim2k,

My acct recently expired. However, I am interested in the paper as well so I've sent an email to a buddy of mine who still has an acct. Once he sends it I'll post it unless someone else beats me to it.

Radix
 

Re: The Verilog PLI is Dead (maybe) Long Live the SystemVeri

Here you go...
 

Re: The Verilog PLI is Dead (maybe) Long Live the SystemVeri

Synopsys sucks, as you may noticed, the best paper winners always advertise synopsys tools.
 

Do you mind elaborating on why Synopsys sucks ??? I find Synopsys tools to be overall better than the competition (Cadence), both in the sense of usability and quality of results. Of course that SyNopsys User Group (SNUG) papers will be concentrated on synopsys tools...
 

Re: The Verilog PLI is Dead (maybe) Long Live the SystemVeri

I went to a design verification seminar. When the host asked what simulars people use. About 70% of the audience voted for m/o/d/e/l/s/i/m, 30% of them c/a/d/e/n/c/e n/c/s/i/m. None of the audience uses V/C/S. Does this tell you something?
In my opinion, except for the synthesis tools, there is really no a lot s/y/n/o/p/s/y/s can claim dominance. However, encounter rtl compiler is emerging, magma is taking away market shares. Even synplicify asic is becoming more competative.
Sutherland is not a designer. He makes his living by teaching/training. If everybody is happy and familiar with verilog, people like him have to do something new.
As a language for design, systemverilog offers little new. As a language for verification, it's way too weak than competative HVLs. That's the conclusion I drew after attending 3 systemverilog seminars offered by s/y/n/ops/y/s.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top