Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
It is wrong! BPSK or 8PSK does not refer to the number of users. They are different kinds of digital modulation. each bit is mapped to a symbol. in 8psk every 3 bits is mapped to one symbol. you can use different kinds of multiple access techniques like TDMA or CDMA or FDMA on any of those modulations, and other factors affect the maximum number of users.
There is no relationship between number of users and the modulation type. except that if we use a greater modulation level we may be able to have the same number of users with higher data rate or more users for fixed data rate.
TDMA or time division multiple access, uses different time slots for different users. the number of users depend on the maximum time slots that the transceiver allocate to the communication link and FDMA is the same in the frequency domain. CDMA in code space.
for low signal to noise ratio BPSK is more efficient due to decreasing the BER. for Higher Signal to noise ratios 8PSK would be the better option due to its bandwidth reduction and rate increasing.
hello guys, in 4g technology the main modulation technique is used is OFDM and qam 64 combination. but with this combination wimax standard got 57mbps . but the basic rules or expectation for 4g is 1gbps. what do u guys think about using OFDM and 512qam to achieve 1gbps for per user. back bone bandwith is 100mbps. and is there any practical transciever of OFDM and qam64?any schematic or anydata can anyone upload?
Admoon, It doesn't matter if you use TDMA FDMA or any other modulation scheme. every symbol transmitted contains two bits of information. If it uses TDMA different symbols at different times may be used by different users.
Added after 3 minutes:
I don't know if 512 qam is efficient enough for mobile communications. I think they have to use more bandwidth, better coding schemes, better multiple access techniques like SDMA, more advanced equalizers and adaptive receivers. and also MIMO technology should be implemented
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.