Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Surface mount zero ohm jumpers?

Status
Not open for further replies.
T

treez

Guest
Newbie level 1
We wish to use zero ohm jumpers on LED MCPCB boards so we can track them up.
We don’t want to use 2010 resistors because they are thin and delicate and will *****. Do specific surface mount jumper components exist?

- - - Updated - - -

I appreciate there's the harwin SMD jumper wires and the MMB0207 melf types, but these are expensive. You would think there would be a mass produced , cheap range of these things?
 

barry

Advanced Member level 6
Advanced Member level 6
Joined
Mar 31, 2005
Messages
5,990
Helped
1,177
Reputation
2,366
Reaction score
1,321
Trophy points
1,393
Location
California, USA
Activity points
32,589
Thin and delicate? What?? Why are you worried about a 2010 component, but not the rest of your components? What are you doing, smashing this board with a mallet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: treez

    T

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
T

treez

Guest
Newbie level 1
Thanks, i would imagine a MCPCB with lots of power leds expands quite a bit, and the 2010 may ***** due to this.?
 

SLK001

Full Member level 6
Full Member level 6
Joined
Aug 29, 2015
Messages
384
Helped
137
Reputation
274
Reaction score
129
Trophy points
43
Location
Coral Springs, Florida
Activity points
2,393
I've always used an 0805 or a 1206 0Ω resistor for this, depending on the size of trace that has to go under it. As for breakage, you have to try to break these.

Why are you using ***** (or is it the edaboard software being "big brother")?
 

betwixt

Super Moderator
Staff member
Advanced Member level 7
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
15,786
Helped
5,083
Reputation
10,191
Reaction score
4,947
Trophy points
1,393
Location
Aberdyfi, West Wales, UK
Activity points
133,698
It's big brother!

The original word is obscured but I suspect Edaboard assumes a fractured zero ohm link is a banned mind-altering chemical.

Brian.
 

barry

Advanced Member level 6
Advanced Member level 6
Joined
Mar 31, 2005
Messages
5,990
Helped
1,177
Reputation
2,366
Reaction score
1,321
Trophy points
1,393
Location
California, USA
Activity points
32,589
Thanks, i would imagine a MCPCB with lots of power leds expands quite a bit, and the 2010 may ***** due to this.?

My original comment stands: if you're concerned about the zero-ohm jumper, why aren't you concerned about everything else on that pcb? And instead of "imagining" the pcb is going to expand, why don't you try "analyzing" it?
 

T

treez

Guest
Newbie level 1
Thanks, a thin planar component such as a smd resistor is surely going to suffer shearing forces as the aluminium expands.
We need to lay the board out with the component which is least likely to fail.
I think the failure would come after months of expansion and contraction, so i doubt we could test this in the few days that we have to get into the market.
 

dick_freebird

Advanced Member level 7
Advanced Member level 7
Joined
Mar 4, 2008
Messages
8,216
Helped
2,289
Reputation
4,588
Reaction score
2,327
Trophy points
1,393
Location
USA
Activity points
65,697
A zero-ohm jumper constructed as a SMD resistor,
will have the same reliability attributes / issues as
any other so-constructed component. It is no worse
risk than the rest.

Smaller components are better since the thickness
is likely similar and "moment arm" is smaller. Since
there is zero resistance there is zero power dissipation
and no reason for a large body other than rated
terminal current (internal or external, land/trace size?).

If you want an early answer then you want accelerated
testing (you do not have to wait months for, say, 1K
temp cycles). But I'm guessing that along with "late
before you start" product development paradigm,
comes "spend no money" (because time is money and
having neither, seems to be a theme here).

Really, dude, you need a better class of customer
/ employer. It's just one thing after another and
none of it good.
 
  • Like
Reactions: treez

    T

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating

ads-ee

Super Moderator
Staff member
Advanced Member level 7
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
7,938
Helped
1,822
Reputation
3,654
Reaction score
1,806
Trophy points
1,393
Location
USA
Activity points
60,160
Given the coefficient of thermal expansion between Alumina ~8E-6, aluminum ~23E-6, and FR4 ~14E-6. I'd think there would be more issues with the stress of the FR4 and aluminum as there is a larger discrepancy between FR4 and Al than between FR4 and the Alumina used in typical resistors.

I'm sure there is already stress on the package due to solder reflow and the cool down phase. The stress is likely to reduce as the temperature goes up as the working temp of the device is well below the point where the solder solidifies (freezes ~200C).

I think you are "stressing" about nothing.
 

senilicus

Full Member level 5
Full Member level 5
Joined
Feb 26, 2007
Messages
264
Helped
77
Reputation
154
Reaction score
67
Trophy points
1,308
Location
Amsterdam / The Netherlands
Activity points
3,271
My original comment stands: if you're concerned about the zero-ohm jumper, why aren't you concerned about everything else on that pcb? And instead of "imagining" the pcb is going to expand, why don't you try "analyzing" it?


2010 components are "famous" on their risk off cracking during the assembly. I have worked at Lucent Technologies for a long time, and it was strongly discouraged to us 2010 components. We have had several designs were 2010 components were cracked after the soldering process. So still, I would not use them for that reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: treez

    T

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
T

treez

Guest
Newbie level 1
We have had several designs were 2010 components were cracked after the soldering process. So still, I would not use them for that reason.
Thanks, this sounds like a nightmare. It doesnt surprise me, 2010's have the appearance of delicate little tiles. Im not surprised to hear they break.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Top