Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Stealing charge pump power from RS232 driver IC

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jester

Full Member level 6
Joined
Aug 18, 2012
Messages
377
Helped
7
Reputation
14
Reaction score
7
Trophy points
1,298
Location
.
Activity points
4,754

hi,
I have connected the +/-9v from a MAX232 RS232 driver to power OPA's with no problems.
Low current drain of 2mA to 3mA should not cause a problem.
E
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jester

    Jester

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
My advice to anyone who does something different, is to validate your assumptions by "pushing the envelope" a little.

For instance, let's assume you measure or calculate a maximum load of 2 mA. Then test your circuit with an additional 1 mA load (can be a resistor) to make it 3 mA.

If everything continues to work fine, then you can safely assume that you have sufficient margin to account for component tolerances, temperature effects, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jester

    Jester

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Without getting into too much detail , understand that your Tx is bipolar signals but this chip uses an Rx threshold of +1.6 +/- 0.8 with hysteresis , approximately and can only supply 2mA if the RS-232 load is zero.

The source and load impedances of RS-232 are designed often with 1k source and 10k loads. So 2mA load will cause transient dips in voltage that are caused by data patterns affecting both reliability of charge pump voltage and RS232 data.

it might work for one chip without external noise, but worst case? Who knows with your input signal patter, toggle rate and loading.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jester

    Jester

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
Without getting into too much detail , understand that your Tx is bipolar signals but this chip uses an Rx threshold of +1.6 +/- 0.8 with hysteresis , approximately and can only supply 2mA if the RS-232 load is zero.

The source and load impedances of RS-232 are designed often with 1k source and 10k loads. So 2mA load will cause transient dips in voltage that are caused by data patterns affecting both reliability of charge pump voltage and RS232 data.

it might work for one chip without external noise, but worst case? Who knows with your input signal patter, toggle rate and loading.


In this application, I'm not using the RS232 driver for RS232. I'm using it instead:
1) to drive an ultrasonic transducer in a 3.7V system
2) to power the mux and op amp

The power supply aspect seems to be working fine, breadboard reality test substituting a LT1014 for U3 not so great.

cct1.png
 

Hi,

just out of curiosity:
The vertical R = 100k, is it for impedance matching?
I wonder if it makes signal better or worse compared to a 0R ?

Klaus
 

Hi,

just out of curiosity:
The vertical R = 100k, is it for impedance matching?
I wonder if it makes signal better or worse compared to a 0R ?

Klaus

I will test and see, the idea was that the Mux internal resistance (closely matched at about 100Ω) would make this a differential configuration. I don't have a MCP6021 to test with today, but I did find a TL084 (GBW=4MHz) so I replaced the LT1014 (GBW=1MHz), and the response is somewhat improved.
 

Hi,

I see,

my thought was, it is to be symmetric to the introduced charge by the analog MUX...

For lower frequencies i think it doesn´t matter, but it will have influence when the MUX switches...postivie or negative, i don´t know...

Klaus
 

Hi,

I see,

my thought was, it is to be symmetric to the introduced charge by the analog MUX...

For lower frequencies i think it doesn´t matter, but it will have influence when the MUX switches...postivie or negative, i don´t know...

Klaus

Correct, however the timing of the transmit burst as well as mux switching can be controlled tightly by the uC, so I think that aspect should be okay. I'm going to start a new post regarding the receive signal, the power supply aspect looks to be okay.

Thanks for your thoughts (much appreciated).
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top