Simulating Inductor SRF using Lumped Elements

Status
Not open for further replies.

chiques

Full Member level 3
Joined
Nov 21, 2007
Messages
168
Helped
2
Reputation
4
Reaction score
2
Trophy points
1,298
Location
California
Activity points
2,534
I see that the equation to determine SRF of a capacitor or inductor is:

https://www.coilcraft.com/getmedia/8ef1bd18-d092-40e8-a3c8-929bec6adfc9/doc363_measuringsrf.pdf









But when I follow this simulated circuit shown on https://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedias/self-resonant-frequency , the equation is the following for an inductor.



I see they mentioned they added a factor of 1000 so the equation works out. What I don’t understand is why the equation is way off from the SRF version.

Note: The Microwaves simulation in my simulator is close but still off. I get 1.7GHz SRF where they get 2.3GHz.



When I try to correct the simulation to



I get:




Anyone have any idea what I’m missing here?
 

Sort by date Sort by votes
Are you assuming that any RF inductor has a parallel capacitance of 1 pF? It's just a typical value used in the microwaves article. Has to be replaced by an actual value for your inductor. Also ESR may be different.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I think it's just a typo: in the article (of microwave101) they wrote pi*2 instead of pi^2 and SRF*2 instead of SRF^2. The factor 1000 is used only to convert between measurement units.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I don't know from where are the 1.7GHz and 2.3GHz results.
51nH in parallel to 0.2pF resonates on 1.576GHz.
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
albbg said:
I think it's just a typo: in the article (of microwave101) they wrote pi*2 instead of pi^2 and SRF*2 instead of SRF^2. The factor 1000 is used only to convert between measurement units.
Click to expand...
This is confusing because if I correct their typo's, the circuit does not simulate :/
 

Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…