Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Routing a hi side gate drive: NOT over a ground plane?

Status
Not open for further replies.

cupoftea

Advanced Member level 6
Advanced Member level 6
Joined
Jun 13, 2021
Messages
3,122
Helped
62
Reputation
124
Reaction score
139
Trophy points
63
Visit site
Activity points
16,257
Hi,

We are Routing a hi side gate drive in a Half bridge LLC converter with Vin = 390VDC.

Obviously you wouldn’t route a high voltage switching node over the lo side gate drive tracking….so the reverse must also apply…that is, you should never route the hi side gate drive tracks over the ground plane (since the hi side gate drive tracking is indeed a switching node as its referenced to the switching node).

…As such, I just had to put a gap in the ground planes of a four layer PCB as attached….you can see the secondary pins of the gate drive transformer, and the hi side gate drive tracking going to the FET, in the “clearing”, now cleared of ground plane…..clearing such a ground plane area, on three layers, took over an hour. Is there any quicker way to do this? (in Eagle Pro), and do you agree that it needs doing?
 

Attachments

  • Hi Gate drive and ground pour.jpg
    Hi Gate drive and ground pour.jpg
    435.8 KB · Views: 146

I'd expect that Eagle has a keep-out polygon (also called plane obstruct) feature like most CAD tools.
--- Updated ---

In switcher PCB we often have splitted rather than continuous planes, with plane areas assigned to the switching node(s). Gate driver circuits would be placed above a respective plane area.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, yes Eagle Pro 7.4.0 has keepout for top and bottom layers (tkeepout, bkeepout)...but not for those inbetween unfortunately
 

Hi,

you may use an auxiliary line with the width of the isolation, then align the pologon to the auxilairy line.
After that you may delete the auxiliary line.

Klaus
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top