Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

RF Power Amplifier design

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mabrok

Full Member level 4
Joined
Mar 1, 2017
Messages
223
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
1
Trophy points
18
Activity points
1,597
For designing RF PA, is it required to be S11 & S22 to be less than 10 dB on the whole BW?
Note: BW= 2 to 3 GHz S11.png
 

For designing RF PA, is it required to be S11 & S22 to be less than 10 dB on the whole BW?
Note: BW= 2 to 3 GHzView attachment 138534

A 10 dB return loss will give you 90% through power. Which is a typical spec criteria.

In your case, you will lose a lot of power from 2- 2.4 GHz.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mabrok

    Mabrok

    Points: 2
    Helpful Answer Positive Rating
S-parameters are not much considered in PA design.
Instead, Load-Pull,Optimum Load Impedance,Optimum Source Impedance are more considered.
 
Ofcourse, load pull analysis is an important step without which you don't know what impedance - power to match, but the small signal response is necessary as well. Initial design methodology always goes through small signal response (small signal stability analysis). This is purely a standard academic design process point of view. When the designed PA shows instabilities, you will have to backtrack. Not everyone has the resource to do a large signal stability analysis, e.g NDF, Nyquist plot analysis or even a HB analysis.
 
Tq for information
In the attachment, after optimisationS11 & S22.png
 

A 10 dB return loss will give you 90% through power. Which is a typical spec criteria.

In your case, you will lose a lot of power from 2- 2.4 GHz.

Thank you

Are there any way to reduced it?
 

Tq for information
In the attachment, after optimisationView attachment 138549

This is just fine. But more than this, you need to look at how close you are to optimum load impedance? Do you have load pull data at these frequencies?

I'm assuming you are using some sort of GAN on si power tranisistor.
 

Nope I do not have load pull data
 

Hi
In designing RF Power Amplifier, how we can know that BW is achievable?

Note, I am doing design using ADS.


TQ
 

Hi
In designing RF power Amplifier, What does affect S11 & S22 Input and output return loss?
 

I design the input and the output match network using the optimal input and output impedance from loadpull, but after that S-parameters especially S11 and S22 is always larger than -10dB. And how can I deal with it ?
 

I design the input and the output match network using the optimal input and output impedance from loadpull, but after that S-parameters especially S11 and S22 is always larger than -10dB. And how can I deal with it ?

It's normal because Optimum Load and Source Impedances are not Complex Conjugate of s-parameters.It's a problem of compromise.You will select a optimum point that will give between a better Reflection Loss(es) or Maximum Power.
In fact, the compromising points are more than this. Better Gain or Better Efficiency,Better Power or Better Efficiency so on..Therefore designing seriously a Power Amplifier is a really tough task.

But matching conjugate of S11 to Source Impedance is practically will eliminate some constraints.At least S11 will be closer to ideal case.Focus on Load side, it's the key zone to work on..

- - - Updated - - -

Hi
In designing RF power Amplifier, What does affect S11 & S22 Input and output return loss?

As you know well, these s-parameters are not independent ( I wish them so) due to S12 so while you're playing around one the other starts to move or vice versa.
Matching S11 to the Source then fix it there will accelerate the design steps.
 
but how can I get the optimal source impedance for a better s11 ? use source pull in ADS ?
 
Last edited:

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top