Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.
My name is Itai and I work for Ansoft's representative in Israel.
SIwave has a wide range of capabilities for Signal Integrity and Power Integrity simulations. It's features are developing rver apidly, so you always need to get the latest update from your local ansoft rep about the latest and greatest.
What type of problems do you expect to solve with SIwave? That would allow me to give a more precise answer.
My name is Itai and I work for Ansoft's representative in Israel.
SIwave has a wide range of capabilities for Signal Integrity and Power Integrity simulations. It's features are developing rver apidly, so you always need to get the latest update from your local ansoft rep about the latest and greatest.
What type of problems do you expect to solve with SIwave? That would allow me to give a more precise answer.
The question is regarding the FWS (also in HFSS). You can produce an FWS file (e.g. spectre format) and preserve the negative terminals. Let's say you produce an FWS out of a two-port microstrip for a frequency range starting from 0Hz. You will get a spectre file (.ckt) consists of 4 nodes: p1_pos, p1_neg, p2_pos, p2_neg.
Now, you use that file in a circuit simulator (e.g. cadence spectre). You connect p1_pos to Vdc. You also connect p2_pos to a resistance and then to ground. Or you can connect p2_pos directly to ground. The negative terminals are left open.
This is basically the same as connecting a Vdc to one end of your microstrip signal line and ground the other end of it.
However, the circuit simulation failed. Can you please give comment on this?
I know HFSS does not do any DC simulation. But when you run SIwave, it first solves the DC. Does it really solve DC? or only does extrapolation like in HFSS?
I'll start with the easiest question. HFSS extrapolates to DC, it can give a better guess when used with the DC thickness option, but it's not a DC calculate per-se.
SIwave has a DC solver which gives accurate results.
When you say the simulation failed, I suppose that you mean that the spectre simulation failed. If I were you I would do two things. First try running Spectre with the original SIwave S2P file (there should not be any difference between the S2P file and the FWS file since you have only 2 ports). Generally speaking Spectre should be able to transient an S2P file directly. If you run a more complex SIwave simulation (and export a DDR2 64bit bus 128 S-Parameter file) then you should use Ansoft Nexxim (which is Spectre compatible but has a special S-Parameters transient algorithm). Second , please connect the FWS (or S-Parameter) file properly in the Spectre schematics:
If the N port S-Parameter (N=2 in your case) is represented with a symbol that has 2*N terminals then connect all of the N negative terminals to the circuit zero ground node. If the N port S-Parameter represented with a symbol that has N+1 terminals then connect the last terminal to the circuit zero ground node. Connect the remaining N positive terminals to their respective power or signal voltage (there is no terminal for the ground net, more on this below).
In some circuimstances you might want to circuit simulate a Full Wave extracted results (such as SIwave or HFSS) together with a Quasi Static extracted results (such as Q3D , TPA or IBIS pkg RLC models). In this case (only) the thumb rules above break, and you need a better understanding of what you're doing.
So here is the explanation. Let's imagine that you have an IC on each side of the Transmission line. Each one of them has their own local ground terminal and their own local signal terminal (right?). In SIwave or HFSS we do not assume that the ground voltages accross all of the model is zero. The ports are referenced to a specific place in the ground plane very close to the signal. The only question that matters is this: How much power (or voltage) does the circuit simulator excite between the local signal and the local ground. SIwave couldn't care less if the Signal is 1V and the ground is 0V or if the signal is 101V and the ground is 100V, the voltage difference on the port is still 1Volts! For the sake of simplicity let's say that 0.1V is lost in the line, so the output of the S-Parameter would be a difference of 0.9Volts (again SIwave does not care if the signal is 0.9V and the ground is 0V or if the signal is 100.9V and the ground is 100V ). In other words, the ground is always local ! Any inducatance or capacitance between the trace and the ground are part of the S-Parameters and you cannot separate the trace from it's return path. Back in the circuit simulator each port is represented by 2 terminals (in the 2*N symbol case). The voltage difference between these two nodes is all that matters for the S-Parameter block. So the first IC excites the Transmission line with 1V and the other IC sees 0.9V. You cannot tell from the results if the signal is 0.9V and the ground is 0V or if the signal is 1V and the ground is 0.1V. For the IC it doesn't matter either, since it uses its LOCAL ground node as reference. So even if you assume that the ground in the second IC is zero, it might not be the case. The buty of all this is that even in reality (in the lab) the measurement is always done with a local ground reference and not the "global" ground of the power supply. By definition high speed (and RF) signals always travel with its return path, and the measurement is done between the signal and the local ground reference.
There's much more and I encourage you to contact your local Ansoft support.
My name is Itai and I work for Ansoft's representative in Israel.
SIwave has a wide range of capabilities for Signal Integrity and Power Integrity simulations. It's features are developing rver apidly, so you always need to get the latest update from your local ansoft rep about the latest and greatest.
What type of problems do you expect to solve with SIwave? That would allow me to give a more precise answer.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
