Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

[SOLVED] Question about impedance matching

hunas2127

Junior Member level 2
Junior Member level 2
Joined
Feb 20, 2025
Messages
20
Helped
0
Reputation
0
Reaction score
0
Trophy points
1
Activity points
200
Until now, I was only familiar with conjugate matching, but while reading papers, i came across the term "reactive matching"
I'm curious about the difference between it and traditional matching
1743339941804.png

also, I'm wondering what the difference is between a transmission line and an artificial transmission line
artificial transmission line
 
Until now, I was only familiar with conjugate matching, but while reading papers, i came across the term "reactive matching"
I'm curious about the difference between it and traditional matching
View attachment 198615
also, I'm wondering what the difference is between a transmission line and an artificial transmission line
artificial transmission line
I've never heard the term "reactive matching".

"Artificial transmission line" likely refers to a lumped element transmission line, i.e. a group of inductors/capacitors meant to behave like a transmission line.
 
I've never heard the term "reactive matching".

"Artificial transmission line" likely refers to a lumped element transmission line, i.e. a group of inductors/capacitors meant to behave like a transmission line.
I don't fully understand.
A transmission line is used as a replacement for inductors and capacitors,
but does this mean that inductors and capacitors are used to replace the transmission line?
If a large inductance value is not required, I don't see a reason to use an inductor.
 
I don't fully understand.
A transmission line is used as a replacement for inductors and capacitors,
but does this mean that inductors and capacitors are used to replace the transmission line?
If a large inductance value is not required, I don't see a reason to use an inductor.
Quoted paper seems to refer to IC design. In this context, transmission lines are probably not an option.
 
I don't fully understand.
A transmission line is used as a replacement for inductors and capacitors,
but does this mean that inductors and capacitors are used to replace the transmission line?
Yes, sometimes transmission lines are desirable, like for making couplers or splitters/combiners.

For example if I want to make a wilkinson splitter for operation at 1MHz, I'm not going to use 50m of transmission line for the quarter wavelength branches. I'll use a compact LC circuit instead which mimics a quarter wave transmission line.
 
Yes, sometimes transmission lines are desirable, like for making couplers or splitters/combiners.

For example if I want to make a wilkinson splitter for operation at 1MHz, I'm not going to use 50m of transmission line for the quarter wavelength branches. I'll use a compact LC circuit instead which mimics a quarter wave transmission line.
I understand. Thank you
 

LaTeX Commands Quick-Menu:

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top