Continue to Site

Welcome to EDAboard.com

Welcome to our site! EDAboard.com is an international Electronics Discussion Forum focused on EDA software, circuits, schematics, books, theory, papers, asic, pld, 8051, DSP, Network, RF, Analog Design, PCB, Service Manuals... and a whole lot more! To participate you need to register. Registration is free. Click here to register now.

Pros and cons of MikroC Pro vs CSS

Status
Not open for further replies.

saeidjabbari

Member level 2
Joined
Jan 9, 2010
Messages
43
Helped
4
Reputation
8
Reaction score
3
Trophy points
1,288
Location
IRAN_Urmia
Activity points
1,565
MikroC Pro or CSS?

Hi for All
first of all excuse me for my english.
I want to start work with PIC microcontroller. but i don't know which compiler is better and which is powerful. I think MikroC Pro is better because have best help and library but my friend say this compiler has a bug and not work correct.
Please Help Me :cry:

Thank
 

Re: MikroC Pro or CSS?

saeidjabbari said:
Hi for All
first of all excuse me for my english.
I want to start work with PIC microcontroller. but i don't know which compiler is better and which is powerful. I think MikroC Pro is better because have best help and library but my friend say this compiler has a bug and not work correct.
Please Help Me :cry:

Thank

ME TO.
 

MikroC Pro or CSS?

I've used CCS for most of my projects and little to very few on MikroC.

Personally I'm quite comfortable with CCS, although it is not so well documented with help and libraries compared to MikroC, but one you get use to it would matter a lot.

And of course haven't encountered any bug so far!!

Good luck
 

Re: MikroC Pro or CSS?

Thank you so much dear friend
but i think MikroC Pro is POWERFUL than CSS?:D
 

Re: MikroC Pro or CSS?

saeidjabbari said:
Thank you so much dear friend
but i think MikroC Pro is POWERFUL than CSS?:D

I don't think so.
I am also a CCS programmer
 

MikroC Pro or CSS?

Hi,
According to me mikroC is more powerful. I found its code very efficient. It is very good at arithmetic operations and bit operations.
My vote goes for mikroC.
About being buggy, maybe the older versions, I've used the latest version: mikroC PRO for PIC v3.20. It is completely bug-free, or atleast I never encountered any bug.
 
MikroC Pro or CSS?

Iv been working with on CCS compiler for while... and there are very useful functions you can use for advanced project. Some things are made is CCS really simple.

You can check CCS compiler web page, there you can find what you are looking for.
 

Re: MikroC Pro or CSS?

I have dowenload MikroC Pro & instal it . found some problom,when i pres :start debugger: [F9] .give msg. failed to start debugger -DGB file is misshing.
 

Re: MikroC Pro or CSS?

Thank you TAHMID
where can i download last version of MikroC with patch?:D
 

MikroC Pro or CSS?

Hi saeidjabbari,
Latest version of mikroC:
**broken link removed**
This is the free demo version.
 

MikroC Pro or CSS?

i like cc5x more, but for fast production ccs is good, i have not used mikroC,

tahmid , is it free?
 

Re: MikroC Pro or CSS?

rajudp said:
i like cc5x more, but for fast production ccs is good, i have not used mikroC,

tahmid , is it free?

No, its not free. Above link is just demo version.
 

MikroC Pro or CSS?

No,
But the demo version has no library or other restrictions except that program output is limited to 2k program word.
If you want to buy it, I think it's cheaper than the other C compilers. $249
 

Re: MikroC Pro or CSS?

Tahmid said:
:?::?:

99% of people are using cracked softwares. And I don't think students and non-professionals are willing to buy genuine softwares.


use microchips free C compiler(Students edition).
 

MikroC Pro or CSS?

There are cracked versions of mikroC available if you want it. I don't think it'll be too hard finding it.
But I like non-cracked stuff. So I just use the free version.
One more thing, in my opinion, mikroC is LEAGUES better than Microchip's C compiler. (This is just my opinion and I know there are hundreds of people who will also say Microchip's C compiler is better).
You should at least try it out once.
Anyway, 99% of the time I use mikroBASIC, not mikroC.
 

Hello I use Mikropascal and for me is the better.

I use too css and mikroc and like more mikroc.

The version pro of mikroe compiles in the best.

But i like more mikropascal pro
 

try CCS I have both the PCM and the PCH compilers for 16F and 18F series.

Personally I think CCS is better, but then thats my opinion.
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top